| OCR Text |
Show T1IK Miri-I )1K tOUUT. V (Jaeallnn or Waler Ulglil". V (ae of I'crseiml Injur. Jliscel- lallnius Ileitis. Tho following ci-pacsme lefore Ihe Judges of the Territorial Huprome Court litis morning t TO AMKNIt AS altrrttAOT. In thu caiu (f White va, Ihe Union I'uclflo Hallway Company, have was gnnted tu amen J the aUtract, an 1 tho aps al was relnitatel; apnllant lo submit sub-mit nit cate on Inlet. Tim Htstr HMir vs. the Union I'acino Hallway Hall-way Compan . The motion tn mnend was allowa d, as In the fureolng care. Till. TUFTS SltUKCI C.IH.. Ill thu divorce apjaal if Tufla vs. Tuft, by agreement liavu was grouted to ami ml the alalrart. AliiTllfll AIIIIITIIIV. Onmo'l n f Judge Jl.ndeuon, Mr Charlie 1'. I) lug of Mlchliau ws.s admllle i to tarlKu at the I ar of this Court. AIIUVT WATIlIt mullTK. Theiasuofll M Hotter vs. Daniel Cook el al was tin ti tiki n ii, the np-iiellant np-iiellant lielng re ri-eetiltil I y Atlnrney tleolge Hiltberlan I; J. W. . Whlti-cotton Whlti-cotton api-zarcd for the retontlent This waa an o i eal from Judge Illsck-httrn's Illsck-httrn's court, thetiolnt at Ifrue tulng Iheq leitliilinf theacftlirnni tit by ei-I ei-I ro rlatlini of certain waler rights. Thu iasu was eiibmlttc I aftt r argument. A CASRur ITIlWtll. lMJflU. Tim neat matter down for hearing waa that nf Hans C. Anderson, re-iohdent,T re-iohdent,T the Union TacUla Hallway Hall-way ant Depot com) any, apptltariL Tills w i" an nppial from Judge Mlnei 'i court at Odeti. I hu origins! compl tint alleged tint on May 21, 1801, Anderson was eul p!o)cd by tiinilefeii laut company ai a laborer, anl that while working by nr Uer of tlie forutnanuti n certain roa Ibed and grade at a silnt utidir a looNonu I lit feitlve embankment, with, tut nu) fault en hi port, lie waa In. Jured by reion of thu falling earth. Tor this damegt-a Initio sum id $.1),000 wetuilshued. On the trial Judgment was rt it le'ed fur llio sum of STUi) ) ami o eta $1,181 Homii (our in uittia littr, on tbu luarlng of upu!!ai t'ant Hun for a now trial the uoitit nude an order granting a new trlil utiles the re-apondent re-apondent should rimlt $J,Suil of the Judgment, which was so reinUli-d. riirrcupon tlie motion fir the new trial was denied, and Jiilgmsnt rui diret In favor nf tho rcepnhdeut for W, anlco.ts $1185 Against this an a peal was now tjkin. |
