OCR Text |
Show THIRD DISTRICT COURT. Ad Action for $10,000 Against Ibe City Railroad Company. TUB mtGnirA llllfllUIIT. I Camllilalo fur tlm Itefuini chool. Short Onlcra Made hj Judge ann lo.lar. Chief Jmtlce Xine held court n," uaual tolaj. Thu Aral oiau on trial wai- tint of I.dwarJ U. Hooper ami iJliabith llooer(for whom I.inoyi riienart apiared vi. thu Halt Lake City ltill m I ojuipiny,repreonlud by Itiwllui A C'rlkhlow. It waa an action tor damajei for $IH uud nnd coatr, on nccouut of xir. aotialliiurloi auitalnej by the female plAltitlll un rleptumber 14th, 1SDD. On the data uumcdMra. Hooper wna n iaeei)ger byouuor thecompauy'a lararuuiiing frum Klithth Houlh to l'lret HtmtU and I. ait lemptc. uud the alligation la Hint, without notice or warning ot any kind, the rpeed ol thu car waa euddinly accelerated and the iiiotlJti Juat ,aa audduuly ibeckud by thotuoluiman In charge. Thu illict uf thla waa that Mrs. Hooir waa thrown violently to the lluor, her laca and eldo bilug badly hurt, ehu nUo auatulned lulerual lu Jurlia of u eerloua clmrautur. tula la thu avcuud trial of tho caae. Clin llrt hinting w hud a year ugo luit Boptember, when thu Jury fouu I for thu laiutltl lu the aum uf tlUiW. Motion waa thereupon made for a new trial un the ground of "mlaconducfof thJur, whlih thmuurt gruud.l. rue uitlou will bofjujlu atubuornly by u jtiuael on both aliltia, uud the trial la ixpected to lait thu gre iter part uf thodu). (ID in ovi it full ONK UAV. The hiarlaK on thu order to thow cnuto In the tuuu of Helectnieu llnrvoy II irdy nnl JohulUtiltirvi.thu Hoard uf Uaiivaawra, by which It la aoughl 1 1 mlolu that ludy from laaulng certlfl hih of ileotioh lu nganl to the Mite of Halt l.lku county, foreelecl men, una tj hfiu come on thla uiuru liu, lutallcmume tain between omi limit li-mit (Judgu lleiiili raon and Judge lmof bourow ) and tho Court, thu matter waa ouiillnuid until tomorrow. When the Loir I had complete! the inuNaieof Halt I.ikucoiiily on Hitur-diy Hitur-diy ufterilojit, tney laauwl cirtlllcatea of eleill in tu ull the olloora elcU who nppllid for thum. HllOIlTOltllEUS. In tho caao at Ha igur va. Hoiger default de-fault waa entered uu motion or plain tllt'ecouhiol, J M. Vuurg, va. A I'. Bahrnedtr et. al. Hie Inuring of thu demurrer Hi thla itatti r mi ei lor tomoirow. Ulovaunl Culghlne v. J, Newmm tt.nl. In thta case the demurrur waa uviriuled unit tim Uaj a iilljwoi to au-anir. au-anir. (Icorgult, Tntiuy etal T (loo. 11. L'lnl mil. rno motion for u no trial wnulloiioJ. M iry Anderson m Thorn n Vuiinar, M iilun for uoutlmianco overruled. Harriott Duke et ul. va. Uacho! lteggullutiil. Jltlened hy content uf tbo pirHi to Attorney J, I.. P.aivlli In try uud rti'crt fliidlnj,i. lu thu Mm nf tho I.irekn 1 1 lit Mlulug Company va, tho llulllou Hti'k uud CAllfornla Mlnlug Ujmpiny, n decreuwu eutereJ, on repiil of tho refiree, for theplilutltl. A iikkottsi aunioi.fcUiiJi.qi. A. K.llaiue, thu ltl-yiar-ol I worth) who too i pirt lu thu thelt uf tobacco a ebort time no from thu grocery eetah lUhmant of Johuiou, Itsmluglou ,V Co , will oomj up be ore JuJgo Kiuu tomorrow, ua u cuudllate lor tho nforiuachool. BbBBSMBl |