OCR Text |
Show GRAND AND PETIT JURORS. A DrawingHade This Homing For the April Term of Court. nosr oiiims ms mstiiAnai- Two lloji loinmllltil lo the Ittform M liool 1 lie Herman Dltnrco l'c. Tho loullifiil.lorgfr, AldrUsr. Oblef Justice Z.llio held an hout's rrnlonof tho Third dlitrlct court this moruliiK and at 1U1S adouruei until Haturday licit. Throughout tbe ootn InK wack. his Honor will boocciil led wllh the otherjudgrs of 111" Huprerno court. The atlendauco of attorneys In the Third ilMrlct court this mornlDR was muoti smaller than usual on motion day and the builmm Iraniacted was llRht. The rlril tiling done was the draw Ing of names from the Jury-box of Juruls who may be called upon to. servo during the April term of court. Die following Hit wai callod: on Nil JUIWIIS. Wm. r.lby, A. It. Maynr, I). 0. I'owell, O. W. Hteel., O. V. Bnow, Juhu Darker, (Ifo. Blade, J. C. Conk-lln, Conk-lln, Don C. l'ack, A. K. Keeler, J. W. Hummeihaya, r. H. Hnarr, J. I. Hardin, II. N. Htaiidlli, Huith Anderaon, CsWIn McUormlck, J, II. Jemiiu, AlexCohti, l-ou l rriT jujtoits. J. W. FlUgeratd, Jat. ltustell, Jat. (. Ilobluiuu, Jrank K. (Jllloaple, Jamta lllakv, V. J. Moore, Thomas Carter, Wm. C. McDonald, Joaeih (lienor, J. II. llarlon, James II. Iiln-ford, Iiln-ford, John MoDul!, Wm. I,. Crane, N. A. Hcrlbner, II. M. Hlntdill, A. ilanauer, Jr , M. Clibbuns. J, It Miller. JolinT. Lynch, Itenry llawdMi,Cail C. Fablau, l.ratmusHorenreu, l.ucene F. Jones, Joieph Olson. H. I'. tVisler-Ueld, tVisler-Ueld, V.. M. lllihop, N. A. Wulrolt, Charlta 1). ilami, Danlrl Moltae, Mans Collin, D. M. (Jrlflln, Diulel Clays, C. M. Hammond, 11, i John-sou, John-sou, J. T. ritrluger, Charl.n While, head, It. M. Harmon. William J. Croft Hit r, Hue Harris, J. A. Chute, os ms own mcoiiNii'AMJru. In the cii.o of Frank KlctiarJt, a colored man, Indicted mid awalllnc trlalounchargoof adultery, Asslslanl District Attorney Hmlth upilled to the ccurt that thodefendant be rolia'od from tbe peiillrnllnry on hi" own rroodnlianroa. Tho order was made by Ilia court. THAT lOUKU tOltUEIl. Mr. Hmlth also mentioned the care of W. F. Allrtdge, tho young inuu agalmt whom thero inn two Indict-ments Indict-ments for forgery. Couneel staled that the county court reevntly adjudged the defendant Insano and ho had been committed to l'roto asylum. Ho therefore asked that tho charges bu now dlsmlued. It waisi orJeitd. Itf IiFl-umi DIMS 200. Attorney H. H. Lewis a lluj to tho court on behalf of Wm. l.Htir, await- Ing trial on n charge of crand larceny, thsl the defendant be admitted to ball on his making a lath depult of 20), which was all the money ho now Had In lila Ofclon. fho application was granted. 1, liter Is iharged with Heating $15 on n"urn IWDg" transaction trans-action nllh another man. tiik iiinxANDtvoncEOAir- In llio raro of Maggla Herman ts. F. J. Herman, Attorney ilinny an-tirared an-tirared tor the ilalnllir and Judge llogo for tho defendant, who h I been died to show cnuio why he should not bo commlllo I for conlemi t In ills-obeying ills-obeying an order of ourt In tho dlTorco roceedlngs Instituted by his wife. Defendant was calloJ to the witness stand by Judge Jloge and questloneJ as to his financial tualtlon. tin Is by trade a car inter, an 1 stiteil that at the tlmo tho order of tho uciirt waa made he had no available funJa In his pofsoialon, ami Is still In much the same flx. He had had no work to do and had failed to borrow Urn money, though he tried toilo so In order to com) ly with tho order. All the money that hu had he sunk In Ills houit , mi which thoro was a mortgage, and Ihern was sllll duo about tlWO upon II. Defendant was also now In nrrcar wllh his boar I till. His wife waa itlll llTlng In tho lioufe. Fending the trial of the case, the dofenlant waa directed to lay JiJ attorney's fern and f.Uleomt cot, also I".) per month temporary alimony, It was now ahowu, hoviuTer, that the wife herself Is at I relent ocupylng the roar portion of the pnmlaand alio rtcelrlng (be rout of thefroi tiarl. Judge Zsne, under thu clrcum. stancca detllued to commit the defendant de-fendant Judge Hoge then urged thecourtlo set the trial of the cam lor an early day. All thu allegations In tho complaint urcro, he ssld, denied, nud the diioud-ant diioud-ant was anxious to hate It disposed of. Judge Zauo said It must comoonlu thuordluary couiiv. ItrtullS! CCIIOOI, llltlDS. Twoauiall Itoys, whose nanus were glTenasltobert MaDoiialdand Henry llrowD. and who haj been ootivluted by n jury lu Justice Ore's court of rctlt farcin, wero ushered beforo Judgo Zine w Ith a view t J their being committed lo the Hrform Hchool. McDonald Is 11 years old, mid his ite father ssld that for the last slxtcou months lie had been aulto ungoTirn-able. ungoTirn-able. The age of Drown, whose real name tumtd out t bo Welohehky, li la (though ho dors not look It) and the lathtr reliled how his ton had run away from home on ono occasion and otherwliu of late given his larunU much trouble. Tho boys were convicted of stealing a number ot sacks from Urant Ilros.' livery stables. Juilgn Katie directed that tho lads bo seut to thu Ogdeu ltiform Hchool. SluTIuS OMHIIULU). In tho case of l.zra Thompson et al. vs. Daniel Keith, it al , win motion for a new trial was overruled and ten dajs stay allowed. m lintAUI.T. Wm. I.cKoy t. Jos. I.llli. Judgment Judg-ment ly default. DixiitK uv lonrcLosunr, In the casa of the Xorlli Amirlcan Havings, Loan and Dulldlng oomiany vs. Faul l.mmersou et al , u dicreo i f foreolosuro was entered ly default, S1UU attorney's ft o being allowed. A ur.siUHiir.il. H. Haya et al. vs. Louis M. Johnson et al. Demurrer to answer submitted and taken under advUement. JAIK )IOt ION'S- OASK. In tbe case of Jack Ilolton vs. Oeo. Naylor,the defendant wna allowed live days' stay In which lo serve statement torn new trial. UO.tr 011TA1N8 ms lit Ll'ASE, III the matter of thu application of Henry Host for a writ ofhauuaa corpus, theanuie waa demurred to on tho hearing hear-ing this morning b County Attornr) Murjhy. llio defendant wus repre-suntidnyH repre-suntidnyH 1. Armstro.ig. This Is the case mentioned In Wedmsday's Nl-MB, In which tho defendant was lined JV) and costs by Corainlsilouer 1'ralt on Hi ptember 7th, ltiJ., pleading guilty lo a charge of embeisleiutnt and ordered lu bo Imprisoned till thu money was paid. Dsfendsnt's counsel coun-sel held that the ludguient was llhgal on the grounds that thu commissioner hud no lurlsJIctlou torondcr a Judgment Judg-ment which amounts to an ImiiHjii. mi lit of over six luonths, and that it was not staled In tho Judgment how long tho defendant should bu lmils-onod lmils-onod for each ot the said flnu uud coli. Judge Zne ordered that tbe defendant defend-ant bo forthwith discharged, holding that hu could not bu legally detained niter thu expiration of tho six months. DiSMiesi u. Thu I'eoplu vs. Arthur Kews and Llull Hchlag (an old ludlotmeut for houiebreaklng) wna dlimlsaed on mollouof Avslitaut District Attorney Hmlth. TO AJIrlu COM 1 1 AI.Nf. A. II Cuitur vs. I'. Tlernan. I Ivo daya allowed pinlutlir to nnicud com-I com-I lalnt on stipulation. l KFonr jurxit UAUTLII, Jutgu llartcli sat lu thu Hupreme court-room thlsmornlu and also took almi.il In lhlrd dlalrlct work. Die followltig matters among others camu biforu hi in up to llio noon hour: Anna C. Mai iulit vs John T. Msl-quisl. Msl-quisl. riio di fondant had btun cited no show tausu for oonttmpt for failure to I ay alimony. Thu lourt, altor hearing hear-ing thu defendant's itatement at to Ills lnabllll) to (aj, luforuied III in that he mutt endeavor henceforth to pay alimony nud conts, and lu con eloorailon of his futuixcllort ho would not now bo held In contempt foe past falluri. JinnloM. King vs. Fred King. On motion of plaluilll's attoruuy this divorce di-vorce suit was dismissed. A commltteu consisting of Attorneys W. II. Dickson, W. Van Colt and H. liowii., wasu) t.olulid lo txamluelutu thu limits of 11. T. Lloyd, upon his application to bu admitted to j raotlcu in tho Third district court. 'Aan'n Havings HjiiU and Trust Co. vs. Wm. M. Itjdalcb ut al ; do. fuult ordered aa to thu defendants m. M. llydulch and Margaret W. llydalch. 'lriimanU. Angell et al. vs. I,. D lluucoital. Motion to tlistulsH na to IteUccn A, lluuci,on llio grouud of Iplulutllls' failure to amend cum lalnt granted. Hocksworth vs, White; suit for foreclosure fore-closure Deurto granted Ij' default, |