| Show THE DISTRICT COURT I Chi Easiness I 1 Now Banning t I Both Dlilslons MOTIONS iicfoiu junoi utiiTcir I Ono In Ittfereiico lo a nonnllfnl Mailer Ilio Oilier At to a Ulorre Tho two tranche of the Third till Itlct court hays boon In full working < order again today Judgu llirlch began lili moruliie by making tho following I airuiir UIIDCII If H ImiKy nJuilnlitrator vi John 1 VarJoll et al 1 Demurrer lo cOlorllol passed lutheokiuof tbe Ieoplo vi Charlea I WbllebeaJ IndlelaJ for rrana larceny tho defendant woo nrralgned aol plead nit Kullly lIla bund woo reduced to U60 lo be approved by Cumrulftlonor Uroeuman Jauiei Uoddard vi K 1 lone et at 1 Demurrtr to comhint lei for hearing Dtoembtr ilit Hjlouion Karpu 01 al 1 vi tho Lode Purnllurn A Carpet t Co Motion la relax cotui tot for bcnrlUi December I Sill providing tbe court can reach 1 1 by thai Hint TUB DEfnilIJAIT UOTF Lejal argument were next nine on I motion for nneir trial In Ills IIIOI 1111 Ile note of I Jooph Holt V CharlH Ivariou Tun action woe tried before Judge llarloli and jury In April lait when I Ttt did wai renilinvi for plalnlllf lu Ibu UIII of II12I4J 1 woe upou Ihli 111 finding that Urn defendant now moved through hale attorney Colo M M A Ivalghn Attorney WlnUn api oared Hi epiKiilllon ollIlon Bull wai originally brought tu I te cover SI2IH7u I lulireot thereon from rrol Juuulit IbOl and coal alleged lo bi due ni the nut balance of ininey paid 111 byplalullfl aId other peronn lo do feudaol for the proouilng of deed I lo certain land lu llouulKul addition toWliells l Hat 1 woo clilmed thai I1S760 woe paid la earon In cx cm of the amount rnjulred for thou rtluld lnnde Ibshst hu b1I luHl the iuui of IIOS75 leaving unpaid Hie kaiauco Iud Ion Thu plalutlllj caio ova that In May ISJI Aoy Ibo defendant repio eiited to him and olhen that ho Wee this agent cf Ibo probate Judge of Davli county Utah hoc IOu collection of lone old expemei for iirbOUiloR deodi to land lu tho addltlunal plai bOo nnuied and thai the coili for Ibfu led I hot and making convoy wai WA 51 ilrlytng upon Iheio ilatemenU plalullfl paid la 10 1169 and l Ibo other prnona their proportion 1 wai ilaled however on the trial IbM Ibo full charge made ihould not bavo exceeded r > i > cr brad br-ad required by the lowe ot Ulau Upon demand being nods of defendant lu Arch 1892 for the return of Ibo amounli paid I In exueii of the 9 ho refuted la yield but conletilug thu Iu correclneii uf hli repreientatloui lu Ihetamayear returned 5 trail per lotof the lum uuiiitly colleciej amounting In Ihu ugiirvgato to 10973 leaving Ilia net balnnco named I ai lued lonlnl other pallid lullrelied having ai IlnluS ilgned nlallltlll their reipecllvo amouuti 10 rho motion for a new trial wai Laiod on ural grouudi nmoug them allegeil iriegulamy In the proceeding ot tbo com and aimta of < Hi I dlirrellon by which Ibo defendant was piovvnted from huvlngn faIr trial exreMlvu dma apjHMriiig lo buvu boon awarded under Ibo lullueuca cf paMloii or prejudIce luiulllolenl bell mony tajuitliy Oho rdloiaud encore tf law U < jn tbo ojncluilon of the arguS I menu hIss caio wai lulmllled lo ills donut I TIIK KINO DIVUKCi EDIT Un Baturday lit Judga 1aweri on behalf ot Ibo uefeodant lu Ihedlvurcit ca ebf Fred King vi Jennie M King moved fowl ntluun illpulallou rIse focI were given lu Ibal dayi Ntvd Mud Iba mailer now came up ai per arrangement ut lOot time for further argument Thu plalutlll woe repre willed by Attorney Bluet hey A Htrte1 A UiiTiu WHI gruiitou by de fault I lImo tint Icitauco by Chief Justice Ktnr rcnllllmud on Ilub luUU oocnilon iiy J udgu lunch uu Iliu trentth uf I certain alleged itlru allou ali alter Iho wbolu tnlug ual been apparently icltlcd MnlClng ap 1 I eaiedon Ibu icouo and rrfnJIatcd this eullro proceeding Hencu Ibo preiunt hcailug wblcb li proceeding Ihli atlemoou |
