| OCR Text |
Show THIRD DISTRICT COURT. Judge Zane Decides the Actions Brcnjut against E. R. Clote. 01IK IIEII.MinT!) AIIIMI'lVril. Trial of a Stilt Willi Itegsrd tn Cer- tain l)liiulnl l'rojicrlj. )IN- rtllanioni .Mailers, Anaverago morning's business was got through In Chief Juslleo Zinc's oourt toiay before tho lime arrived for llio noon adjournment, AN (JUNIUS IIINDntU). Ills honor first itavo judgment In tho casr of Hsrnh A, Crown ft ol. and Adam Ujdcsii et al, vs. K. It. Clule, late assessor and ol Uctor o( this city, tiled and submltloil yesterday. Tim JuJo remarked re-marked that ttio suits were brought ii restrain tho city from collecting an assessment against tho plalnlUIV projerly for the extension of water mains. Hucli extension, liu silJ, was autborlted by the charier of Hilt liiko and by ordinances, and ho was uf opinion that the methods pursued were valid that no euMolant ob'cctlon n Isted, according lo the complaint of the plalntlfls. Hence his honor denied the Injunction In both casta. 10 ANSWER OS TIIUII1UAV. Olaf Ilaon was arraigned on a charge ol adultery, nlluged to liavo been committed with August) Anderson, Ander-son, in this city, on August 15th, ISO J. Thoaoiuied took die statutory time to plead and was Ktvuli until Iliursday. iiAiiu as ma sum-rn.3. Kiel) Nollien was lo have appeared lo auiwer to an Indictment for unlawful unlaw-ful cohabitation, lie failed to do so, however, und his bunds wore Ut dared forfeited. I'lio sureties wore tslels Itatmusseu and Christopher Cramer. VII.I.IA1W AND I'Air. John C. Wllllsms an) Klltli O. I'app should alio liavo Uon on hand forarralgnmont on a charge uf adul lery. Hut Williams waa not tbiro whan Ida name waa called. Attorney IIurd(for lliu defense) Informed the Cuurt that Williams was In Donvtr, but would nirlvo lu Hilt Lake In a short time. Tliu defendants' loia will boiakou next Momlav; at all events that waa tho date Used by the Court forthu urpoe. iu aim: i-atmi James Varnia Is Indicted for obtain, lug money by false piotenats. In ion-cectluu ion-cectluu with thiikalo ol certain milling slock, aa already stated lu these cul urns. Attorney Aittur llrown ppta tu move tliu court to iiuash luu Indlii-meut Indlii-meut at a later period of tbo day. A Ut.NHlAl. UEMUllIII II. U. H. va. I). V. Diamond, charged Willi a fiaudulant use ulthe malls. I u this liisn Attorney Cherry asked leave to withdraw the du'endanl'i former plot uf not guilty and tu enter a general demurrer to lliu Indictment, un the ground that It did not state eulllclsut tacts, l'crmlssloii wasglveu. poiiiCbusuiti:. Mary A. l'urcell t, James Vorgan. eonj suit for foreclosure. Decree entired ns rayed and $50 attorney's feo ul-luved. ul-luved. fhos. Curler va. Halt Lake Imprive-ment Imprive-ment and Kntural Uts Couinany, P'ortclosuro suit. Decree as prayed lu this suit also. AI.KXtrJUl.lt DimTISflMI. James 1C. lluchanan vs. Diulul Alexander it ul. Hearing un motion ol 1), Alexander tomodllythn decrto uf tliu cuur. In ruturenue to the Alex audtrrialuunco, uoutluund till Bitur-day Bitur-day next. 1)1 FAULT. H. 1', Ilroman vs. Jacob llroman; dlvone. Deiault of de enJanl entered. TU V14ITIIIB CIIIIIlllKN. i:iltuJ. Bniltll vs.Hamuel II, HmltU, This Is the dlvorcu suit In wnloli Judge Auderson, as refene, re leutlyKMhtiid the deorie. Judge 'Ainu now made an urder allowlu the de feiidaut to visit the children al proper times. TIIK MHU "AMFNDKU." Halt I.akul!ulldlugand Munufaotur IngCouiiauy vs. Win. l'.U'Mtara elnl. Leave given to luterllue tho word "ami tided'1 lu the answer and cross complaint. A I IIOPEllTV Dim utu The first caso of any oomt.uonoa on trlnl was that of Ueorge luwla (for whomJudgn Hulherlaul uud Julgu lluwnlt uiared) vs. Xsnttiu li Davis it al , represented by Atturuty H. II, l.ewa and Altjruey Hunter. It 19 a suit lu quiet title ton certain plecucf rial i stale alluu.0 ou Heveulll West, between I'lrst Kortli and .North Temple, In this ell). Hie do claratlonotthe plnlutllr Is, lu cllect, that he liirnlelitKt llauuah Lewis. Ills foster motlur, with the moiity with which to puiuhasu tho lot In question, aud that nt her death hu hliiiself wua In pteeesslun. Uu tho other hand, the llalutllla claim that n man named Davis was au equal owner with Mrs. I.owls, that she dial Inlislulu and that they (defendants) ns Davis' helry, are entitled lo the properly by III herlt Tbo trial was In progress wlieu the couiladloutned. Till, uu is NOT UT. Judge llartoli and tho attorneys In the cum of John M. Young vs. I'rank II. Httphens, wnloh Lebanon I'riday, base belli tugging lutrd ut this suit nnlu today, 'lhlsmoruliii; testimony was still being taken, un t there waa eviry (initiation when the cuurt ad Ji.uruedlurluuolieon that the end will not tu reachel uutll tomorruw, ut tho inrlitst. |
