OCR Text |
Show .luiluicnlt Ijitercil. Thufollowlug J idgmeuta havatncu eniereJ on the bouka uf the TliirJ'jj,. trlct court: . ' ' illoe.Hlex i Co. tj. A..l3,'yiju,nj John lleikj JuJgment ,, , i.uintiir.toj $o,i3j. tti,j CMt, Zlou'a Having. llankJuJ ,,;,. pauy v.. William Au , w Ci H,r',?l0b.Va1","!U'lB ''"" "'l,,u-tlirafur$10IOau.Uooll, "'l,,u-tlirafur$10IOau.Uooll, m!,.K;"r'.-,",r. J. I). Walker; JuJ-?n?i JuJ-?n?i .f.J&'Wnl'U lot Ssn-Hi with iiml-nornay'a fae and $H SJ colli. . nf,"a iu Jlfoi. va. Uroeibeui .1. llotuh-. llotuh-. I'J Judmenl ru dared lu Invor uf UJpialullUa fur J4.13.0ll. Crane Compnuy vs. the 11. 0. CoRln llaidwarecumiaiiy;Judgiueut In favor uf plalutlU by conleailon lot $117.9 J. K. Mattln .V Cumpany va. C. It. Fuotr; Judgmeut lu favor of plolntiir tor $;8oJ(j; ub.tiuct from Uuminia-alouer Uuminia-alouer Marttn'a court. Halt Jaiku City lliewlng Oomploy vs. J. C. Morrlaaey; Judgmeiil In lavur of plalnllll for J.U1.J5; abstract Irum Justice II. II. (J llllll. |