Show THE DISTRICT COURT Arguments In thg ClumbersEmery Suit Lasted All Day IUV AM NOtION CUrwU fair linn HIT lly Judge llirlcli An inerlnlbe Utah MirMrr Suit Ulb r Stlltra Chief Jutloe Mirrltt liai LHn 111 telling all day lolho lgl 1 1 argumenli III tha Clio of It a Chamber vi Hush II Emery adtnlnlitratrlzof Ihnatlala ol Albion II Kmery Ibo taking IM tlmouy having oloted late yctlerday allernoon It Ii I expected that Ilia matter will La ubmlltrJ lo the court iiime limo Ihli oveuliig at a ijwlal culon stroes Jul Cuelel AMoclato Juilloa llailch hit Lean engaged with the law and motion cat ntlar today taking up Ih cam In lImo oder In wnlch they apiwar ou III lame Nolhlugel auy iiclal moment came up durIng the ar < umentt Ill the cope ot Joititi lloll v C K Ieanon r iorloJ In these cohimni yeiterday sad lubmltted upon motion lor a new trial tIme Court ibis mmnliiK ovtrruled the moiion and aa exception waiautered A rlay ilxlydaye lOA granted to prepara tlalemeut oil appeal ermlHloii being aliOKlven lo uiealaunitmlon the 11I111011 lor a now trial upon si peal Jon Nixon Hliolx vi Henrietta Yvailon ttal 1 Default and decree of loreolciura Mary 1 Kro t el al I VI Kmtuellne 1 > Itutcll tt al Wollou for a new trial haloed by conient Wm 11 Hoy at al vi I J Mc laughlin el al 1 Demurrer to complaint com-plaint patted by coaieut lllohard A Iowa ye Klltibelh Hbuwellt Motion U Ktex cokli ton tluued by content Ueorge IV Mowry el al vr H A ryltr Demurrer luieoouj 1 atneudej ooiuplalul argued and lubmlltid Aa TO THIS UTAH NUIIILIIY 00 Attorney U rj Varlau on behalf of Ihedeleudauu liai flied hli aniwir lu the Third dlitrlct court In the cat cl Aarou Keyier vi I f Keliay Jat IC Ullleipla Kll UlllMpla hit wile Juitlua A Uoudhua W Omitn and T HuiHti Utah Nunery Uu and MII Howlci I aMlcuee Ills llorlb upon Information and belief that at the time ol the uxciitlou of the mortgage referred loll plain ime ctiuiplalut Hadln Keliey WAI the wife ot louli 1 KaUy uue of tha mortgagor that ill tin I a dower IcIest It ait and iluiitiUr all properly prop-erly described in laid oimiilalnt lIod IlIorIKg iou II I a lole ary and proper parly to thin roO1I1 r1lIr action lhat the Utah Nurtary Co being then Iba owner ol the irtmlwa lu IUtiliou on November lull ol the lrcItt year regularly conveyed the same lo M 11 l Huwloi at iMignea In 101 ion the beu > IIlol their crvdllorr Detendauti limber avr that In Number Nu-mber 1891 dalindaul Juillne A Uoodhtie booed inch preuiliea 10 1arker ft De ue for a term of Hire yeari liritlunlng Iebruary liliai IbBJ ala itlpulaled rent of lOSOU piyabh moulhly liiiunuof foliO Ihlirental tldendantiiay wai laid lo Uoodhue Illl January IblnilLco which dale the corporation heieln tamoj hai fold iollllbg over tohlm but that by the direction ol tile plalnllll Iarkrr A Depua have dlicharged obligation Hence Iho delaudauti auk that au arcouutlliir bu had between K yMr 1arker A Depue and defeudiut Uaod buy they urcu thai the nursery oor lonitlon IOu uoceiiaty hourly lu the action and ihould bo brought In eu moll It li I further rayed that plalullll ta require t 10 makti tiadlu Kelwy and iatker V Djime partlaa lo their till 1 and > that upon Iba final hearing iiich mm only bo decreed agalnit the properly ui may be fuund legally due lu Iho plalutllf cULumi VB VIISON In the cole uf W H Culuer TI K O Wllwu and llllo Wil jit hli wily the court on nutiuu of Attorney Varl an hiimuitaliiud tho UiiiiuiriT Wills Ion lo plalntlll amend within leu dayi Phil li tha ttilt III which eo much litigation hai pravioutly taken liar In regard In the Lurtk hotel al 1 Kureka Mr Wilton was formerly lIne llelle Tompklur ho havluic ub blood a dIvorce from rompklni In IbM ou aoouuut ot Ills Inlampuralv habili and murtluJ bar I prueut hui baud in Jointer Ibfll THE KlNCl D1VUROK COIl I In IhodlvrcoMill ot Fred A ICtof Va Jaiinlo M ICIIC heard before JuJno llartoh yuiterday nltvrnooii the mollun lor a new trial apullrd fur by Juiiiu 1owvri on behall of tho defend antwa irauted and the IiuarliiK Mt fur January 4h Thui III hydra hai tteu let aililo lor tho wcoud llnir IIK liver iAY ur John T HnoUon Was a ihorl tlmn alto ordered lu I how otuio why h mould nut to I puulihed for gihlniii In lolling to ply t5 per month alimony to hli divorced I wile mid n lioarlny thereon wan had before Judge llartoh late jetterday atUrnooo AuMlldavli by thu dloiuint Will put 10 Ha set forth that he WOO unable thcouijh poverty to jay the alimony and that na did aol have aufllolenl money It coma to thli I city from Mautl I where In I LOW rcildeo I TUB attorney I fur Mr Hneluu contended that tha delanduni I II il l III had not mob a proper ihowliiK The court ordered that inn defaulting panty piy thin allmi ny now due about U6 lulao doy or go tajall I |