| OCR Text |
Show TltL, III li o ae.CMlAt. ,,eatul the Hire tu llieluurlfue hyiiipmhr, l'Altts, Nov. 10. Thu appeal of Mrs, Deacon from thu decMon of thn tribunal trib-unal of the Hi luu, declaring that she had uo rlisut to ap ly for divorce from her husl and and awnrdlnz the tustsdy ol thu children tu Deacon, camu up today In the Urst chamber of the court of apical. Dencon was prisent, but not Mrs. Deacon. Ilarhoux, lor Mrs. Deacon, charged that Deacon had a violent temi er, and neglected hts wife. Hndeilared that fur two J ears, IHaoou had studiously Iguorod his wife's lla. sou with A lie I lie, and refuned to apply fur a divorce, becauiu Mrr. Diacon paid the boutihold eronies. On tho night Deacon killed Abcllle, there had lien no criminal Intercourse In-tercourse letwtcn thu latter nnd Mrs. Dracou. Deaiou had consented con-sented that Mrs. Deacon should havo two ot Hie children. Deacon's present demand for tho daughter was due simply to a deslro fur veiiKeaniu und hutrel to his wife, llarboux claimed that Mrs. Deacon was utlilu4 In requesting re-questing her chlldrin until uu appeal was decided. Hhe had takeu thu girl from thu convent to preient tho husband from sending her to Amorlca. Continuing, Ilirbuux deolered thu nttltude of Mrs. Deacon after the tragedy comparable with that ef Mary Madeline, who suppllcntuj fjr sympathy, lluatke-dthuuourt to placo thu child In convent and allow Mrs. Desoou to visit her weekly. |