OCR Text |
Show K' TUIItl) DISTIUCT COUItT. E ' Douinco bull Asalntt Minim Drothori. K Other Hem. HW A damage ault waa In progrera before A II Judge Zauetodoy," tho plalutllla belug H I KlluWImmerauJ ZlnaUroeu of l'ay. F aon, and thodefeudanti Hlmon llrotli- Bfl era of thli city. Tho plalntlllJ nlloge B)t that In 1800 they obtained millinery ft. Uoodi from Simon llrothorj for a tore Bj In Bpanlth 1'ork, Thla eilabllihment HV I operated n few monthi, and the re- Hl 1 nmlulnB KooJa weru trnntferred to H l'ayioti, whero the pIMntlftV mil- B lluory atore had been opun but j: two weeks when I,ouU HI- B' mon, on behalf of the defendants, (demanded the payment of cerlalu nccounta not yet duo. lie wn In- saaBPfaam formed they could not he met, and P, relied ujion nil the stock In the Mo.-r, Hf fixtures, etc., against tbo protest of the yl plalntllls. Homo of tho proierly, It Is BHf alligcd, belonged to other parlleH. r On the other hand Hlnicn llrother U rlolm that when they deintmled pay. Ij ment, they wero Informed that It could .I not be made, nnd were rcuestuil to IH.II take poiwesHlon of tho gondii nud glvu NL1' the plalntllls credit tbvieror. Tlio plalnlllla claim $101)0 for tho HKHB Roods and $2000 damages lur breahlug HHn up tho business. The itiestloii hinges MMi onvthether or notHiinon Jlrolhern took T' theKOods without the iihilntllls' nm. HH sent. On the answer to this, the parties H nre diametrically opposed, nnd today H' rvidence was being given beforo n Jury to enable them to determine the Ht In tho case of Jack Ilollon vs. Cleorge HJ Nuylor, tbo UufuiiJaut was today u. r lowed ten days In which to file a utate- 1 ment on a motion for a nowttlal. HBf Tending niuollou to tut aaldo udg- fh ment In the esse of Aaron Keyser vs. U Thos. W. Matthews, Judge. Zino today HB) letued un older for may of uxecullon HbV f t payment of Ju Iguieul for costs. BJaajaBaPTrTL'"1- ' '!SI |