OCR Text |
Show Ilf fnto .liulhc Ktocger. The case nf U. II. Campbell vs. 1'.. M. lllgg, ndlng In Ju.tlcu Kroe-ger'acourtjln Kroe-ger'acourtjln which Campbell claimed judgment for 1 10 for tmlnllng the dome ull the Oaark house, to which lllgga put lii a counter rlalni for $101 for falling to lerform a certain jalnllng eoiitract and JlOd for rt hieing to accept a certain cer-tain lot contracted for, waadeolded yesterday alteriinon. The court held that the defendant1 claim waa bar redly tho statute of frond lu that It Inaolved a contract for tlnrraleof laud which should hae ten In writing, nud kave Jtl Igmeut lu favor of the plalutlirior the sum of $M. |