Show lAW LAv VIlA VIOLATED 10 Of BY C CONTRACTS I Is CHAR CHARGE f 1 77 Power Contracts Believed by oy Utilities Body to to toBe Be Preferential s Charging that certain special contracts con con- tracts existing between the the Utah Tower Power and Light company and sev sev- seven enty-seven ent I seYen other corporations or 01 persons per per- per per-j sons sons Eons for electric lighting or power purposes are arc discriminatory and preferential and in violation of the laws of i Utah the public utilities commission 1 this lefterI after after- erI er- er in an order an handed ed down ordered the Utah Power i noo noon noon has and Liht company and the seventy- seventy 1 seven ot other er contracting parties partes to appear ap ap- ap- ap pear before it November 11 1 to justify the existence ence of these contracts Included among the contracting parI par par- pa- pa paI I tes ties tics it is said are the Utah Copper CopperI I company comp ny practically all al of or the large lage coal 1 mining companies In Utah some of ot the larger Jarger metal mining companies some of I I the towns In the state the Hercules Powder company compan and the electric rail railroads rl- rl ail ail- roads roads in the state TIle The commission has ha examined the contracts and finds that the special contracts contracts con con- tracts are arc not in accord with the tariffs of ot the light company filed fed with wih the commission com com- mission lon are discriminatory and preferential prefer prefer- enta I. I and as such are in violation of ot otte the the- laws las of ot Utah Uta te |