| OCR Text |
Show "Mormon!...'' nntl lullJelil). Jdi'cr iHwrtt Au: In an Article entitled "Why I'm I. dtnt l.llot I Denounced,' jublUhtd luthe DhsatiT News ou Apill llthi Mr. Charlc Kill very otrougly im (h&ilze hi opinion, that tho MMor ni9Q" Church muat look to the Infidel cf the country for n atanoo agafnit the "church people.1 "Iteacli the ml tidy he (, "of those unchurched piot lo and you letlle tbe whole future of Motmonlam." Thl may apcear tobe all right to the viidouof Mr. IJIla, who now ackuowl. vJgeahlmitlftobeanXallrjctdliiflJel,'1 butai many olhen vltw it. ill- not true, a ud ihould net aland unchallenged, unchal-lenged, the future or thu Church of (lod roati with a greater power than that excrulimJ by frail mu, te they lutldil ur ClirUtlan-." The future of "MormonUm" d(ind on the adherence of Ita dlaclplea lo the word of Cod, unt'jelr falthfulnea In all that li kood, true, noblo and virtu oui, Theao are the mi am by which our victory wlrl b aocouipltahed. It 1 all right to ipread Mr. 0! licluteabroadcMt for tbo Information they contain, but the desho for thtlr I ublfcatlou kbould not bo allowtd to go togvthor with tho auppnaltlun that "Mormonlam" and infidelity have anything In common J, M. H. |
