Salt Lake Telegram | 1914-01-22 | Page 9 | Comparative Report of Iron Blossom Operations

COMPARATIVE REPORT OF IRON ION BLOSSOM OPERATIONS a When the annual annual report of oC tho the Iron Blossom Mining company waa WM recently Issued Ise somo some Items were not mado made clear to t the casual Cal observer who IB is not disposed dis die posed to make malte his own ow calculations from the tho figures submitted A A. comparative statement and an analysis of operations of this property proper during during- 1912 and amI 1913 1912 has hM been compiled by Geo George o Baglin of ot tho brokerage house o hO of Baglin fe Pond with wih the costs tho the production of or metals and the contents the te gross and not net values with Uh ith profit profs dividends paid and the tho surplus sur sur- surplus plus an and the Increase thereto during the two two years ea The statement drawn off orr a aper as asper ao per toe tho estimates furnished by tho the com corn company pany follows 1912 Development 1912 Development expense footage feet cost cst per foot 1328 28 1913 Development 1913 Development expense expense footage feet teet c cost t per per- foot lot PRODUCTION PRODUCTION- CONTENTS AND AN METAL MEAL Dry Dry- Dr weight tonnage tonnage 1912 t tons ne t 1913 ton tons CONTENTS Gold Gold Gold 1912 oun ounces ce average assay assay as as- say 2147 ounces 1913 ounces avera avera average av- av era assay 1844 ounces Silver Silver Silver-I 1912 I. I ounces average assay ounces 1913 ounces ounces- average assay ounces ounce Lead Lead 1912 LM 1912 pounds average assay per por cent ont 1913 pounds average assay a per cent Copper lOll Copper 1912 average avero per cent 1913 pounds average erge a assay asa per cent VAU Gro Gross Groan value 1912 Smelting freight and sampling i Net rot returns urns I Operating expense Development Total expense 5 Prof Profit on operations operation I Dividends paid old Surplus increase on operations operation only