| OCR Text |
Show 1.VII. DOEItS VII,I. HKJOIl'H. Jn Opinion hj Judge Anderson Ihat doet not I'lraie Justice 1jiuj. Judgo A nde rson yisterday afternoon rendered a iktlslon lu tho case of Itlch nrd, the Afiliau iiiglllst. On rui-day rui-day last Itkharda wat nrretted for vagrancy, hu having at Ihat time no visible mean of tui port. ITj-oii Ulng liroujlit up ho demanded a Jury trial, but wat denied Ilia privilege by Justice Lanoy, and eonleuced t) thirty do) . Attorney (Ilenn piled for n -writ of Imbues cor; ut and tho heating wat tt t for yetler lay before Judge Anderson. Aft.r ll.teiilng lo the uvldem-e and argument for both tides, the Judge took the matte r uu lera leltenient until ?o'f1ock. At Hint hour ho ordered Illihor!-.' release, giving nt hi reason that under the Territorial slatiitct a police Judgo It not recognl Jed exi el t ne njusttco, mil fill criminals upncarliut Uforu Ihu latter are ciillilcd u, a Jury trial If they demand It. The ruling of hit honor ha crialed MmoBurirlie, nnd no one It inoruiar-lonably inoruiar-lonably iniitgnant at the nsult tliati tollcu Justice lanoy and those work liuiundiriinduruuiilhlm. I )lu eu,ct of Judgo Anderson's ruling tlmnly amounts to thls-that any vagrant iroHiltute, druiikard.eto., whu to de tires niny ill maud atrial by jury. The additional expense nltiiudiug UilJ It nt ouceobirloua "SZ . JtOSr; Wfsaaa. f .. M I |
