OCR Text |
Show IV TUOUIILF, llrtl htlila tgrnlt I hirgrd Tilth Uh lalnlnr Montr Imttr lalie I'rrlilliea. Chxrlai H. I)ky and A II.Adkl-ton, II.Adkl-ton, the well known real citato agenla, aredockeled lu Juttlce OeV court on achargu of obtaining money unilcr falaeprcttnac. The complaining wltncaa Is one 1, Ilauman, who allegoa that the defendants, defend-ants, on or about the till day of July of Ihepreaaut year, did "unlawfully, knowingly, designedly nnd fraudulently fraudulent-ly re; rvtctit thai they were the owner of a tertMii tract of land tltualed In Halt l.ako County and Territory of Utah, known a Dtaky' ricrond Addition Addi-tion to Halt take City, an I that Ihey had the iKiwe r to convey tab! ilrtcrtbrd laudaudglv a good and tufllclent warranty deed" lor a portion of the name, to the cnniplalnant.ou condition that he 1 ay the defendant $.Vkl. lfaecomptalnart further allegca that lie wa to ny tho nliove named antfiinlou the inttallmant plan, aud thit he did tiy a cirlaln amount of money lo the defindanla, whom ho nowatya wero not the owner of tho land (two lot!) conveyed by them to him, mid, corM-miently, the money accepted ac-cepted by them for I aymtnt thereon waa unlawfully received. It It furttnr aald Ihat the tract of Ian I known as "Detky'a Hecend Ad-dill Ad-dill n," It tho prorty of K. II. Clin, andthattheilefandantahavenoverpald a dull iron tfie purcha-o price agreed on by contract of lsaJ, and renawiil In May Ult. Oihrr parties ate situated tlmlltrly to Mr. llautuan and Ihe outcome of the case will l watched Willi Intrreat. Mr. Ueaky . poirnl before Juttlce (lee this m irnlug an I 1 lea J not guilty and Ihn cam) wat ait down for October lit at 10 nm. |