OCR Text |
Show SUWIEJIK COUUT. Ihe (onncllminlc t'aia (w t'p for -rguuitnli (llhrrJUlhrr. Thla morning the Territorial Hu I renio court agalu met, and dl.cd of the I nihil i. revrtnl llow. The action if ltoblnaou M. Iho Ore-RoiiHhortl.Inu Ore-RoiiHhortl.Inu wat ordered placed on the calendar and tho liearlnj nt for June ISIIi. A ruin i.iniiuscr. rum ctn The flrtt cue called wa. that of Hong "ling, a Chinaman, v. tho National Atiur'iro company of Inland, aw. hot. It waa an a jienl from Judgo M'nrr'a court at Oidtii. Maloncy ami IVrklnarcprr'cnln! tho Jraioiidinl, llennrlt MinhallrV Hrui-ley Hrui-ley wiro for the liwuiancv rompvny. There wrre two othor action Involved In which Hong Hllng wat ali lain-till lain-till and reapondent and tho Hcotil.li Union and National Inturanra com-Iny com-Iny of lUInburglianl Hi. I'lia-nlx Aaaiirauce couijany were tho dofeud. antaaid aipillanbi. The three cnu.ee were originally Irotuht lu Hid I'lrat dlitrlct court lu order to ricovtr damage, on 1. clia of Inturanc. Iiiued by ihe feviral rominnlra. They wirr, y ror-tent of the .irtlrt, lituni tiatether, nud a virdlil waa returned f.rtlilalntlirln itch law. On Iho ..Hi of HrHriuUr, Hi, nutlcea of mo. on for a now trial wtrn fllwl, aud on the trial tho motion waa overruled. t rom thla Ju Igment Hi. I rcent api eal wat roaecutni. The ca.et wcro aubmltted after a lengthy argument. r-IKCTIIi inovt A 1HII.WAV CAII. Tho next coao arguuJ nn ol tal from Ihe Klr.l dlililct couil, waa that of Thurai Nlchola and flurdon i'c l"''t 'r!indent., va. Iho Union I ''lne Hallway rnminny, aipell.nU. Mr. Moloney appevml fur the former and Mr. Van Colt fir the latli r. Tho action waa originally brought by Mr. and Mra. Mchol. to revowr iltnugi-i for tho alleged w rongfulrjettlou of Iho wife, on (fc lobtrlvili, 1 ii, from one of Ilia lauaeiiifAr ctra ou tho conipiny'a lino of rillway. at a place la.tw.en thai Hot Hprluga and Willard, lu Ibn l.ldir county, ana having no llrket In her t.oii, thuugli It urat alhgi.l the trridi rwl the moiuy tiecra-nr) to defray lu nnt. In their antner the rotiiiany pleaded a rule riulrlug that wlieu a il(killtpurcharil on Ihe train, Si crnltritrx In addition to Iho rrgii. larfiinahilllwilianrpil. This they My, In. rripondeut knew, mil II waa for tlio aolu renvoi! that Mra. Mchol. refuard lo y the.li rent, ilemande.1 that the wm i In ttd from the car. T ho lury rilurnnl a veMlitforl7J, nnj lntrrrtt flu, nuking a tiUt of (SIS, for which aum Judgment waa entered, Willi coaUainounlliig to vi.1. Tbo ililef grounda of aa.al wrre luiuf-flclrncy luiuf-flclrncy ol evidence lo Juttlfy tho vcl diet and errort lu law. Tho niallir waa now tulmlltcd for the court'. conalJitatlon. Tiir.racin-ATiu.f o muii. .A!..,!J,-.ll' """ ' "'0 I'ecplo of UUh Trrrllory, ilalntink. va. loiil. Cohu, Warden T. .So We nud Luclu. Kllall, defendant., waa Uktu up. Attorney I Grand Young rrpre. MtitrU the relator., and I'. U William, apia arul for ibe defcDdanU Ihe amended romilalut waa filed by County Attorney Murphy, mi rtlv-tloiicf rtlv-tloiicf Itfchnrd W. Voung, William J, Tuddeuham and John fewaouHmlth, who It I. declared Ihereln wire at the February election, lbW,tdeclanl duly rleited aa councilman for the I'oiulfi municipal ward, and are luw rrmly and had ouernl to enter uiou Ihefr dutlra. l'lilnlllt. Urrlaro Ihat the Ihrea drfeudaiiU unlawfully uiurivd thorn otllcea and were "unlawfully red mllng to In Ihe rouiicllmru from and for a.ld tuuiilclial ward, to the damage and Injury of Ihu jaorlo of Id territory, aud to the damageof aald ralatura." Wliercfoni 4alutirt. I ray fir lu Igment ajalmt the drfriid-ant, drfriid-ant, that lliry U nt ludrd from i nice and forbidden bi taeniae any rlghU therrunder, and that Meaera, Hnillli, oung and Tudlrnham lai altudgrd to U the rightful bolJei. of Ihe teaia. Tlio difen tantt demur to tha forrvo. Ing ninth lid romplalnlanil allrgtiihnt It dora not ttale fact, .ulllclenl to con ttltuloAcauioif action ngaln.t tlnm. 'I hero waa a ml ilndvr of inrthw, and trveralrauiraooitlou had brtu Im-piperly Im-piperly united In the comi lilnt, Thearguniimt.occuileilliMihaiian hour, and wrro invle up to a largo ex. tent of quotation! from Ihe tlatuti a and from ratea bearing Um tho priieni comi lalnt. Attorney Udrand Voung enipballcallyluil.ini that there hid IminoinJiJolhiUrnf Aillir, aa waa OMirtod liithe demurrer to tho nni-plaint, nni-plaint, aud aatd tho only out. Ili.ti ... l,a.l II, .l-7-...f..... . .7.- .. . ""' . ".ri'iiil. any lljlit lo Ilia teat to which they had hi I claim He anawired that they had nut, anlahoull thenfiru lo com- ellnl lo ul alutoli lliain. He coulend. til that the defemlanU were not en tilled to lo luar I aeiarally, unlea. they ronl I clearly ahow Ihat they had a ra!e and UUlliii t drfei at ; and Ihu. far they had nut iloue Ihu. Mr. Wllllann urged, that Ihe fact thai Ihe government dad Intervened lu thlamieilllnutchauge the rule of bliadlug. Thodefendanla might have brought mil aeralely had they r-i dtilrrd. The linprowr unlllng of tuvrral cauwa of action wat wholly InrcouclltUe with tho I rovltlona of aectloua7, wlilth gave tho varloua claMia of caiim which might Lo unllnl. tut provided Ihat allrauara ao united mu.t lolong to one only of thrw cliun, and limit allett all the paitha to the action. If it were true that Iheieufflcie were imwiillully and in aubatance Ul.tluit, lining the .am. In nothing exiwit tho lerni by which Ihry nru dwlgnaleil, aud the raou lioldlng or entitled to hold onuofthimhad and could havu no Intrrrat lu the other, and no other artoutuldhao any Intrrwt In the one to which he waa enllilgd, how tame II that there lould be turli a Jolndtr of llulnlllla, difemlanlt, and iaum of action at waa attouiled lu Judge Zaue, from whote court tho fuie i-ouira, ittlnd from tho Until during tlm argun!i,ut,vtlilcliwero now aul iiiitttd. Court ailjaurnol until ten o'clock ouT huraday morning. |