Show Jurors Unable to Agree in Trial Trial Trial-of of f 2 in in Ewald fC Case se I t. t Q J I v 01 De Deliberate Hou Hours Hours' With 2 s Without I o out t Arriving at Vat Verdict V NEW Pr Priss A A supreme cau court courE rt jury con con rH ch charge of office bartering against J H Healy aly Tammany district and Thomi-T. Thomi T. T Torn Tom ml maney ney today reported d. d di sili mint ment n was di discharged arlid f f. f t 5 For more than th the the- been jury had b been deliberating on the erld ic fn c connection wi h the a ac accusation that tuat l a and T T m m maney ancy t moncy procure f rm r George F Ewal bI bl post poet n tho ben h. h J f ft t again agan they ey had a told toW o Supreme Co Court Court- rt Justice Justl o oj M they they ver W a le to m mbua mOut ul dc 1 lar but he B h ad r repeat repeatedly p t edly t sent ent them I rn i back back IntI Into theIr beIr room I. I J J I. I r- r o l h sat contended i Irs sint to lI t ir tT ni nima ma mahey fj bi t her herbus bu bus bui IN d. d v o r re under Indictment I irti-i irti J. J t f k i b jur Jury 11 retired Jr V t day fo nO fJ aft r N In ear 1 Ing ing testimony Y dragg ragged d JI on S 'S 8 8 tt it J t. t 14 It 1 I JURORS UNABLE TO AGREE IN TRIAL t Y I. I ORi EW eASE I Continued from page 1 by t they er re reported d s cial several times they they were unable unab to to each a decision but were told to ta tc try ty again sa n This ono of ot the handed a note to the tho Judge Indicating indicating l ing g- g thero there was as disagreement concerning concerning cOn con con- tho the laws lawa on circumstantial evidence M Much cli cliot of ot the evidence b before before- tore the Jury was of that nature I |