OCR Text |
Show gJK jM. HECISIOX IT THE CIIUIlllI MtltH. K flflj ' ' Juikih Zamb rendered hli decision ''""tH H ! ' lhla rnornlnt; Id Ilia three ull In wH B KE , volvlnKtberiueitlonof Ibo cstheil of JHMSj J?'' certain pieces of real ratal which, be flH Ml jR longed la Ihe lite cotporatloll ol Ilia IH Jm its Church of Jeaut Chtl.t of J.aller-day iDH V IK Btlnti. The decision It I u favor of the KCCfl m , & Ooverniient. 'jLBbBM M BfP Juile Zane bolda that tbe Tcrupl H,HBBV.J (V Mock wu worth tin full amount of '"J $50,000 when Ihe lew limiting Dpvj! Iff Church holdings to lint amount went BBBw" Jof Hb D, ",Kt therefore the plecce iHrH bib if property now lnilliiuta ere forfeited V lH under the la wi of Congress. He also TassHaf ifi !". . seem! tohold that the Church did not EBBfl -JkI ';' have any legal tlthl or lltlo In tlirie BH''H pieces of property until tin lownslle I BCfl jBj i law came Into operation. taBaH' W In regard to the Oardo Hoiim prop- LBSBHdjBy'j 4, rrty, however, he Inclines lu the opln IHHJ V Ion Ibil II li a partoutge, and lhatlho fl Bftj J Church la entitled to It under Hi. .B-B J) cieniplloni mads by th Kdmutidi tWKfl mEA j' - act, Hut hell hound by the decree of A 1, the Hurcme Court, which lucluJed BSj J' lhalroprrtyln thoforMture. A '' Aa to tba value of tho Tempts block, ''''i ft lltcemtto ui that Ihe Judtrsli mis 1 j lakeu If ha placet It at 150,000 In 16'C, HBBflHf J la when the limiting act of Congress waa HCCCCj fl laast-J, Thtrt waa no market theu for LLHHH rn $ '" a-''! Hn lurchaaor could not BBSS 53 ','lt lute teen found at any lurh figure. Va.j (1 Aa to that, and other piece! of LBbssssssssKVW '!I eslalelniiueslloii, It item! to common Hf1 .-it Mu (l ' "'" Church IU nol K 1 J.j' haea properly rUbU In tbem In 1&02, HB I jln' therouno cams or rrawn for the HB -J ;l I I"ne of the law llmlllnK churchet IB, J ill'. to IHO0 holdluiti. If the Church R jri I"1'' " TUhlnu Offlct Rrounda In JHp j J! W2, then Ibey are eieinpt from tha I'jHi' J oparatlona of the law, which could not I K Ijl U rttroactlre. If the Church held no LB' fi rlnhti to real ailate at that lime, what PfH j' ff, waathsotijeclaodpuros of tlta law IH, j IlmltlnK Hit right of tht Church In IK ', Of courts Hit Judgs of the DUtrlct H j'!) Court It bound by the decree of the Hu. H . ( prerat Court, and hs could do no Utter m ill than declJo In accordance with It. Hut H ilj hlaTlewtof the parionage matter aro B9 f)t valuable, and are coniouant with H 'li JuatlcuandtbaplalnrueauloKuf thaact H :P7 Thaoplnlonof JudfieSCanelamarked ji with hie unualacumou, retard foreilat. B jpji liiic rullusaandttrlct Interpretation of id the tututti. A new trial will baaeked H '8 for. Inrafslhltthouldnot be grant. H-'' jjS V rd, an appeal will be Uken. The Hu. BSBw''' 'IIIbS 4 irrmeCourtofthaTerrlloryraay modify B ' 1 y tta former decree. Hut It li mors than HHHfl i "' probable that the cae will liars to go HHHj- jj !' up again to the Hupreme Court of the ' I ; Unlttil rltatet, lefors tbe matter will I 'J be finally adjudicated. And It la to I HHH ji hoped that, by tome cometcut meant, fij jit jj Juttlca will U dona at latt, to that the QHHBJ h. I precedent' .ay not be ettabllthud In ' I I;1'! the United Htatea cf goeernmtntal tHHj , )' teliurs of proerty btlouglnK to a rv HHHl . jj llgloutatMiilatloii. |