OCR Text |
Show JUDGE ZAHE KEPT BUSY Divorce Cish ita Still li lit As cesdjnt. oe or 7iii:.i toMi'):oMisrii. A nmlifr nf OrJir 31.J Thli Jloro- Int In V.rltlx r Xtllrn. JihIr. Zn wu.nK.gxl nMrt thn wliul. of Ilili mornlDK In cliint.r., nil tr.nnctrj Ui. IMofUix Inttrol-lnj( Inttrol-lnj( buairut.: In llm dlrorra mil ot Mtttle J. Ilrnmii r. (Iro rK.llf.iniijii, on Hi. gromiUof rru.ltjr itntl Tilluro to pro-Tl'lr, pro-Tl'lr, AllonifrHlew.it iFircKDli!ltliv .llntlrr, r koI lookl nt j oung wom.n .Iwut tw.ntfiur jenra of .r. ll.r.Utnnrnt wo, ln'flrtt,tli.tilin wm in.rtM to Ibo U.f.nd.nl ! Hli.l-don, Hli.l-don, V.rmonl, on tlio lit ot Jununry, 1SSD, nd tli.7 c.iue loHiltI.Vo In tlio fiilloirlnfc Kovrmlir, wlirrn ,lio In I rtIJrl tv.r ln, 1 ! hid i,firl to rorid lirr wllli (ho uecttftirlr. tt llfu, tbwigli .11 blf-liodl.d man. Hp wi"hArJ UtlnliBr,"n'l wheiirtrr bo got hny monfjr he .jrnt It In l!iuur. HUobJ$:,C)lnli,r namo wli.li.b. inttilnl llr.nm.n, ami H'1 ot Ilili, likti .bo rNipM4tl In caih, wm .pfiii ,lntravrlliittitiaMniid tlio urcli-tM nf pruTlvhui. Drf.ndant had done v.ry llltle work .Into thi-lr mairlaci1, and what h. had ramM wrnt clilcily In drink. UjrlnK the time .he had lltnlln thltrllyiuo had nialnt.lned hirBrlf hy taking botrder. and work Invout. rihouwltii liy the difend- nl'.cl,thlliK,tiUt all h had Iwixht li,rwa.onei4lrof.lioc.. lIocallelhvr all a-irl. ot Vila n.mr.; on ono oo ration "rhukrd" and .truck li.r, and had tbrealonnl h.r llfowltli Intliaiiuu and a knlle. Hno had not lived with defendant toen that, tlewa, diunk when he ntUrkeJ her. 1 li reply to the rouil, iilalnlllt .aid Iheder.ndant wo, Dow ro,ldloi In Huitar lloum Ward, and w.,UIrer A young nun named William., a boarJer nt the plalntllt'N houe, t,tl flul a. lo the dtfeiidint'. drunken haldu mid hit bad conduct lonn.nl. her. llohal.ren him threnirii lar when holding n large liub'lier knife In Id. haul. Drfriidint would "get drunk rwn H.turd.y night till Hun-il.iy, Hun-il.iy, and then be tick for two day. af terwarda." Judre Zane granted tbo decree played fur. III! JIA.jCT I'Alll l'l'. Ill the divorce ult of I'.llnUlh llruwn v.. Alexander llrown, u motion wa. made by Attorney Harlow Fergu .ill oalltug ujwu the drleudaut lo .how canto why he.houM not bo punlihed for ooiilcmpt la negleclliig to nay the alimony pr.Tluuily orderl by the court Couiif.1 .all he had be.u In formed on good nutliotlty that the Un. feudant lud .tatwl hu would not pay any more money than he had already paid. Thl, Imweter, llrown driilel. II wm explained to thecourtthat US '.ere .till duo from him. Judge Kane ordered tho defendtnt lo l-ay $ld down Ijdiy, the final herlnir on the motion being jolioiied till Huplelllber Htll IIPUKI) ANU UAH IT IU. The prurenllng, lii the dlrorce mil of Mllbrough A, Keyior v.. J mho II. Kt-yaor ngatu cnuio up, thl. time luullea new and unelected .haiM. Attorney CrltchloK, who amnared for tho deteudnnt 111 lbec..e, Informed the Court that the p.rtle. h,l .ettled their dlllerencc. and wcro now living together again km hu.lahd and wlfr. rUlntltl i.ow filed u ruuuuMt delrliii thatlheitultbodhnilMed and 113 fur titer proceetllng. had tin-rein. Coin. .llill, representing the wife, .aid the allegation. In the original complaint were very .erlom one., a. nglu,t the derrud.ul. l'lalntlll a p. piled for an order Inniporarily retrain Ing her hUHUaud from dUMi.lDg of hi. proi'vrly, an I uln rllod liliu to .how camo why he ahould not vy alter ney'. fei nnU c,t.. The hearlug, however, had never lieell had, It wm truo that tho urtlca bad now rrron rllinl their dltlrrvnc... which wa. very proMr, liut he thought the defendant ahould be called iikhi to y attorney, fee.aud certain cu,ui. Mr. (.'rltchlow Thliwai an aggravated aggra-vated caw of motherdiidaw, and, a. I am Informed hy the defendant, .howat very active In having thee pro t'lftHng. .tartil. I do not know on what prlnclplo coun.el now iwek. to have the d.feudaut bound to y In the way he hu.ugge.teil, In VI. w of all the clrcuniiLnct, a. It a pear. thl. wa. rvally 14 groundli'M action. 1 would like hcru lo revlit uuy tucli claim a. that. Colonil Kalghn Thero I. no mother-lii'law In the rr, let me .ay, osceidtlle love which a woman ha. fcr her daughter, trtio In till. In.unco .a billy treuled. Judge V.no liuuinucli a. thl. motion I. made for the dl.uiloal ot tho complaint, t am dllioed uot to make any ord.r a. to feea In thl, ca.e. l.tt the cut I e Ul.mli.eJ. There I, ( much of thl. anrt of thhigju.t'now (refvntiig t llm Urge numtr of ulvorce cue.), that 1 am Inclined to encourago cjuijiroiuLv. rather than otherwise. inn nuunr.1 luviiRo: OA6ii In the lung landing divorce line of lliiglu. v.. llughoa, Attorney Tut lock liifornled thojudgu that hu ho)od lo hear from Hie defeudaul at a later part of the day, and would rert to the court during the alternoon a. to the preteut .late ol allalr.. SILCKI.UNHllll. Ahraham llumuivr et al. v.. A, Helm etui. Thl. caie, which had pruvioualy b.eu Wforethu court, luiv lug reference to tho damning uf the wut.r.ol lllg Coltouwomt creel., wa. inuiulonud by Attorney Van lloriii', who moved for an Injunction order, which Judge Zane granted. (lenrge II. Church v., Martin T. l.amb it al. On n plication of Atiorney llowuian, le.ve wa. given to withdraw Iheau.wcr of T.A Wwtov.r lu thl. m.e. In tlio inattor of the rlalt l.tko and UotHprlug. llillvtayC'o. va, the Halt hake Mill nud lllev.tir Co., nn order wa. made, ou motion of Attorney Crllchlow, that thuclork imyover tlikl tothoplalntlir. ' ' ' The caw of Htejihen.nu v.. Hlepheu on wa. h t for U Inl ou rtetd. 1 Itb. Huimu Iludl.r .. J. I'abwiii ot al. (In motion of Attorney Crllchlow. the hearing In thl. caw, on tlio order to how cum. h.rtloforo granted, ww.et for Held, lllh, M. U. Btrlug.r v.. Gilbert J.. Chant" brrlaln, Tbo motion to dltulve atlaih-rucntlnthl, atlaih-rucntlnthl, mailer, on aprdlratiuu of Attorney 11. J. Denny, wa, aim .el lor hearing ouHHpt.Hih. The ca-ea of Larvm ninl Henry llulley (fur whom Attorney. Itawlln. and (oadaparod reepectlvrly) were mentioned. An order of the niurt I, .ought uton judeinenui oUalned In the court lielow ag.lnat the Utah f .'eli-tral .'eli-tral lUllrmd (Juminy, III the flr.t wefor Jill l.mnnd In Hint of llulley fortSHU, Including co.tr, to have certain cer-tain money, In the hand, of T. J. Mackintosh appllod In .athfacllou of thee Judgment.. I'latntlfT, were former employe. of the defendtnt com jny, and the original claim wa. for l.lor rfonned. Hy coment the ram were ordered lu land over till S o'clocK. IICTT1KU HAIIi. The work of reiving Juror. foJiha next term of tho Third tlirtrtrl court 1. In prugrcM. Ofthe thirty gentlemen ou the venire for petit lurora, the fol- liwlng have been uh adl !'. V. r.cch., V, 1. Walker, W. II. Itf, Con Ilrl.coll, I.. J, lluth, W. II. Hleplu neon, (leorge llra.tnw, J. . I'arkard.J. I,. Klmlnll, 11. K.r)av,ir, N. V. y.mir, J. W. WhlUhead, Jr., M. i:il,Jf. H.KIncald. I).n Wol.ten-holm, Wol.ten-holm, (f. W. Ilerron, J. C. U. Irvine, liiinmu Kn.lgn, Uf the venire for twenty grand Juror., the following have Im-u terved: J. W. JJonri.ll.n. II. T. Odell, II. rt. Young, C. T. Ktevenmn, N. (Illlla, Charla, K Anuell, Joseph lug.ley, A, J. HI.im lift, I.I, Jam., Clashy, J. I', llralley, M. II. Ileardaloy, U V.. Hall, J. 1 1. Kenworthy. ItB WANTS 11 0IR Ot'T. (lovcrnor Tboiu.. It In recell't of a petition j raying for n .u.iieutloii of sentence In rct'.rd to Dr. Hlnglilou I leu.ted, th ronilltlon promised Mug that he will "leavo theclty "forthwith. It I. Ml forth In tho KtUlonthat Ileus-ltd, Ileus-ltd, 'an iduoatiHlmin'lia. already undergone enmigli mi.lerlng, and hi. wife havlog ss-cu reJ a illvorce an I the cu.to.ly of the children, lie think, thla I. enough to eetlsfy the Ju.llce of the CI., |