OCR Text |
Show TIIIKII D1STU11T COURT. Tlie Injuocllou Contempt Ct.f. Oilier .Tlallcr. llrfore J mite nor, HubKuent to tha proceudlnRa In Judge Zino'a Court reiwrted In yeater. day'a N kwu, thn nn of Matthew Oil-by Oil-by Y. rlimnmr Clawaou i-nino ou. Tho lilalntlrraued to recover UIO alleged tu l duo hlui on a cjntract for eicavat-lint eicavat-lint a collar, Tbo matter naa taken uhderadvUetnont. Th cone of M, Idloman et al. vi. Win. Mclntyr wai dlimlited. A.H. Harmon vi. A. J. While; tho bill ot exception waa auttlod aud llfc-neJ. In tho matter of K. A, Follaud va. U. Wolatenholm, ImoWlug Iho title to a aunt In tho City Council, tho defendant defend-ant waa allowed until April 3cd to nn. awi r. Abbott va. Andrew; tl.s defendant wai allowed ten ilaya aldltljnal tlmo In which loauawir. K, Treweok va. Wm. McKay. A writ of attachment vai ordered mad. ThodlviirciinaoofHarali Aun Allen Ta.Jnmca Allen win thou Ukou up. Deftudant failed to ap4i and a decree de-cree of divorce wai granted "Hi tlio ground of cruel trcntinoiit. 1'lalntlir Iratlfleil that herhutband had knocked her down, kicked her. threatened to kill hor with a liatihel, and habitually uaed abu.leo, vllo and obaccno language. Th, portlc, llvo In rjanpeto County. Htrlckly vi. JUuerbnck. The defendant de-fendant mob allowed ten dayi addition, al lluioln which to atiawer. Aa ier arrangement atatoil In tho Nkms orye.ttrdny, tlio cn.o of tho I.tvo riuaCouaolldated Mining Com-tauy Com-tauy s. tho Hotilh Ualoiia Mining L'omrany wai called on. I,. 1 llnldeii and Alfred K. 1 olden camo up ou an order niUlrlnn the defendant tu allow lauao why they ihould not lio punlaheil for contempt lu falllug to obey an Injunctlau of th court. The ault iiiTolvei tba owuorahjp of valuablo inluliig roporty In lllngham, aud aomo tlmo ago an Injunction uaa grautod natralnlug tho defendants front uxtracttug any oro from lerUlu property Involvi-d lu thn litlgatlou. The plalntlira alltged that In UecomUr aud January la.t the difindanta, lu violation of the Injunction, vnteml u lion li-on the ground and removed therefrom atliaatUUtcniofore, which waa aold and .hipped. The defendant, diuled that they had violated the Injunction and claimed that thoy bud txtracted only 'XO ton of ore, which wai atored al the mine and hold to abide tho re mil of tho lltlgnllon. The argument wero roaumed llila morning and tho cano aubmltU'd. In the cato of Calvin Cartwrlght va. J. I, Ulackburn, the Uifondantwna allowed llvedayaln which to amwir, lu the divorce ca.e of tioulaa (7. Young M.lZwIiiirV. Young, the defendant de-fendant waa ordered to iay Into court fi tot coat, Vi attoruey'a feea and f IS ior month nllmony. |