OCR Text |
Show Uffl a.mjtiiiu mxiimau. lAi-o-am:. Hit It nrcoiraw.;inrssry once more lo lTl expose the Innstft depravity aud In Ufl euralde mendacity of lira Tre-uns ad mH vocate of "Monnab" disfranchisement. I Um For several dij lie lies hern worried tlffl over an article that an-ian-d lu tin. BUB Draratr Nm whhh seat headed IHH "Unity In Life, Division It Uralti." WJfl Tbti truism, which we Imagined np I rrsonrlatmlni;tn U Mm would at Ilnal ' temiiltodlsiiute.teeinslohavossthlni BlTl HB Inaplireniy. In tedious llrado of II jH column and quarter Lb Lwomvi In IMji - Tolred today In curious, mlsture of jH direct and wilful misrepresentation of BBS our wordi and subject and a medley of HJI Ids own sophisms, awl finally reaches UM lilt InevlUblo dally conclusion, which ?Bfl It lli ruling dcluilou of thin mono. MjHIl maniac, that "It li iliamaauddl nBJjj (-race in permit the American tallot to BH koIuUi the stslned hands of men Ihtii HU Involved, or lo permit them to hold HUTI oftloa or make lawi under the Uoverii. uHf l mentof tli. Unlltd Hlalrs." That llto HMLU say, If men are "Involved" In unity of IH sentiment and jairpoHt they ihould Le BHJ deprived ofovcryprlvllcgeof American UY cltlttnililp. And, rr contra, the RBJiI prime uuallflcntlen for voting and HH clouting-ofllce U dlrlilon. Any man nS; whounltti with other men fur any wBJ pureels unfit to hate the American i ballot. Kj Itli wlonlihlng that some -mou BJBj ruunrctrd with the paper that roiitaliu M them dally ratliiKi, doe not p retire DU the raenUI condition of their author. M and either expunge theni or trim them Bn Into pome semblance of common mim, rj In another column of Ihe aame aticr, MB lie rages like uianlao over a bright MM and vigorous communication from Dr. HH Condon of Ogdrn, bt-oatiao that gentle BJB man advocate! the ostabllalinieiit of a Hfl Ilepubllcaii pally lu Utah, and that BrB would divide the "Liberal" ltj-aud vB produce Its dissolution. ' ' Jloaaysi "Theinovemrnt Isall rot, fAH the only iurpow behind It U to dlitract ' AVJ and destroy the Liberal rtyj" and, FSH "jit la little Utter tliau harl karl for Iho W Liberal tty to Ktrate and go I UK lo pieces on pally lime now," la fB not tills an rtdnilaalou that he J Phi Iwllevra our proposition li correct, that BfiW "Unity li life, dlvlilon la dralht" nUI Alt. I Im aia-blni thn tllvl.ln.i nf ft. 9fM lateral patty, If that ! hli motive, yl iloitnlt Dr. Condon, according to Ihe Lhr "i iirlountj lunatic's theory, j rove himself IUH jj. woiOiy of the American latllol, while M 9 his wrathful crltla ahowi, on lit own I logic, that It would be a eljame and a ijff dlagraco, to allow Ihe 7Vioiii acrlba I "to vote or hold ofllce or maVe laws under the (lovernmont of the United jit HUtM?" It . Hut we would not liavo tat en up Kf i ' space to notlcu this Itwanlty If It wire Ma not allied to some of the tnoit out ill I rageoui falfehoods thst any perwu U ) claiming respectability could be guilty J I of The 7rtoune editor In ordrr to allunl B some aliew of JuiUAcatlou fur hit lr fml , rational concluilom, makes a stale w I meutofhliowu which hesulMHMuent- I ly ula several tlmca Into imotatlou 91 W marka and atlrlbulea to u, and further H Bj deliberately falalllca what we dldeay m 9 In the aillcle which has so much if V aroused hli auger. II ? i lleaayi:"Keryonehereknowathat II K this li a dlttluct pvople." ThU he II f UolraaathelanguaguorihoMKHa,n ffl J two turato artlclea today. And on fW II this Impudent faliihood he lftra much iti K of his burin ue of an argument aud iff, lr reachts hla ridiculous conclusion. If J) ThenhBiUoteafroiuourartlrloas fol WttW "Wheu we lirar. then, of au at 1 BIB tem t to nuke itlvlalon of any kind on IB, National luei, whether It be of rore i IB or lD(u,i w knuw that however I I'sS lluu.lljlu tuy be the pnteiU ollerrd ItvPJ for audi ariaratlou. they are rongaii I llBf 'I ling from IviieaUi, Initrad of roiulug Hafty fromaboMJ," fwjfft That Is ivrreclly given, eice t that ' Sara '" '"' f,l'11,l"'r'1 "' wor,l "uallonil" I lu, for a purpoau whlih w III ki ii l,low. If HE lleiajt: I Vt "Wareferreilla lliti a arulinlnallie II W prnufllmt wkat n liato alniiya mil, Ha 'Wx wliatetrryonohirekiiOHN tint, lliit H 9 thlalsaillslliict pooplo under a goM n. H j insnl of III iiarn, Is Iiuk, tint that givetn-W givetn-W IfL unlit Is the pllmhciod, and II... .Vrwi' !( -W tlieorgmof that KOtrrntii.nl, aent out llV Jj this notice lo the wn lo.) rrtent lliom (I rf Uklug any ibougbt for theiiiulrcs on few ln National aubeuU." J "I he .Vnrs wya In one bnatli, Miirry IB (tt MorniunUiulliely free' but In tlionoxt M BT sH-akl!igas Ilia organ of tbo Mormon $M Eft I rleatboo.1, It naval Hie riuluta c.uiio TM hero lo U nude w halt Aineil, jn 'M II Not mucin lo In niflo Mnu iHHipIo,"' jB Uj sndttiit'wlicnuobailhtu.oraluuipta M I H makedlrllouaofaiiyklnilonnitliiiiid BJA R laanea whether It bauf rnij or languiigp, I; jjl v.oknowlhathowover plaualblu ma) W ,H 'he prpleata olTerol for am h a pr iwratl in, 1 ! B they are wrong an I spring from bmeaih H fcJJ lnaha.1 ofMimlug down from alKne,' Ifll B Ut I'S'laiild.'WUruanyiiiioUlryhigtoluako H , MM dlvlalunaim relliiloui laauea vtououl I a tHI ''vo undfralood that Ike urgnu of thi Ml Nt prloaihaal waa ulklng In Ihe Intersil) of WJ nl tbl I luin.ll, but It It oil Ksllorul lauca BJ illl "'' IhU whlppar In .Ionian Ji ptrfwt ! iJlU uiilty," U li 1 he Infamy of this will l hen by a Iff rej roduitton of thu iiwt language wo Irff uaod Milch wai: OK .,.,,W.,.,I, '"or-day Haluta tome to fll -.Ion, they tome to bo made oneiao m Pie. Uiuattira lint whera they weie p (Wl "' rijey eat. their uathelsnda to .B beouiiMitdanUlled with another. I'd. Ideally, they aro no longer l.imllah or (li inian, welah nr Hoamllnavltn, Cil-tin Cil-tin or Hnxon; they aie Amerlunnii. Ilellgloualy, they aie mllher"J(W nor (lrtLk,"(ientllenorlltbrew; they are all one In Christ Jiu." IritllielotelHgcot rcadni comate this with Ihe 7HAuni wrllttV rver Ion of our meaning and ahaolule ti-vtraalof ti-vtraalof ourlanguige, and foruithdr own conclurlon aa lo the honor nud veracity an I decency ol that' utterly un tlnclpled crentuie. The article was written Indrprrcv tlonofdlvllousheru ainoug mj le of l.uropn blitli Intonatloiul factions. Vareopil to Ihe Idea of Irish, Kcolcli, lngllah, llermau, Daiilah, rjwcdlau, Norwegian and otlurdlvl sloni of that character, and desire that all these national Hues la, oblltoraUJ and the people from all lands tojolnnl Inthlacouiilryai Amcileani politically and If they lio Ltttr-day Halnls, na one religlouily. An I the wilful jr-erter jr-erter of our hnguaga and ineanlug aayi want to prevent their "taklug any thought um National suUJecla." I'i reel vet The words w hlrh heaaya w e did Nut use aud which he argiin would have mads the meaning all right, we Ml um-, and the I lea he plelenda we convejed we neither eapniweil nor hlnltd at. While w e are on llila aubject we will make anothir ipiotatlou from his article. Here It Is: "In answer the Aim aaral It la no earthly aaolodlapiiu, with an i.piiieiit wbnee mind la ilenae llial II cannot understand how Iwo or a doic-n or more Ivraona can bo bmugtil lo understand a given Idea nr principle alike without lo.. lug ihelr Individual liltrly' UeUkelt lliaierrry native lrn,iinMtcrvd mer-Ican mer-Ican rllltcn will hare Ilia anna denally of inlud on tbll lutjrd." Will any "native-born, unfettered Aiuerlcanaltlien" whoso brain Is not .sfoggeil by dnig or stimulant or cere I roatlhy, acknowledge that he has tllla "density of mind?" la II oll,)o that a living soul outside of the Tribune ofllce will contend that two or ruoru Iwraona cannot bo brought to utidir stand aglveu Idea alike without losing their Individual liberty? Vet tills la his contention and he thinks every unfettered American cltl.tli will agrra with him. In one column ho blackgnnrds every body who nai ntc uaucoi anything tending tend-ing lo divide the "Liberal" party; J.. the next ruliimu, aide by si Jo with that denunciation ho condemns nil ople wlio underaUuil a principle alike, and finally declares Ihem unlit to have the ballot, to hold of.ko or (o make laws iiudrr the (lovernmont. Tho ipieatlon hiay ho asked, What It Ihe use of paying attention to such a dcllhcratn faWlkr and to utterly lira muili. Hut all thlt mlarepiraentatlon and vicious endiavor to malign tho "ilornioiis-'lt ut forth for the purpose of working for the iwlltlcal drtlruillon of the majority of Utah'a clllisnt. And wo want such ptrsjnl as may through rrrjudlce or thoughtliwiniia l curried away with the (reject, to eeo on what thoroughly false aud souso-leas souso-leas grounds Its advocate founds hla pretensions. The nliulv argument may bo thus summed ut "The Mormons areuiilbxl; therefore they should be dlafrnm bleed. Homo of the Mormons ones, practlcoj lolygamy, the law fori, .Jo It; there fore all thoae Mormona who never prao tlwl ltarodttlo-.nl and should t dla franilil-vd. Home Moi mona w ho have never violated the law btlleve that jalygamy la luth legally nud morally wroug becalm tho law rohlblts It and the Church they Iieloug to forblJs It. Hut they think that If thorn una no legator ctclrehutkul Inhlbltluiioftlioprictlco It would not be In Itaalf eaainllslly criminal; there fore no Mormon Is lit to have the American billot or hold ortlce or make lawa uudcr this (lovernmont." There la nothing more to the whole tirade, exiejl a mut of asaumitlont at lo what "Mornioiis" believe, aud lutrn tloual perversions of Ihelr views and Iho language of their advocate. Tukonut the "ludccenrlcst" lutrn lloiuil uulruthi, garbled reports, reversed re-versed prujiosltlotis, llbeli of vvrty thing aud v r) ludy that dlRVriwItli Its wtlten on any iulJu-1, aud Its stock of foul eplthrli on which It rings Iho changes )ear In and jear out, nud there would not bo left enough of the Trtluni tu fill a single pupe. No ou-di ou-di r that It Is sliding down tho hill. |