OCR Text |
Show "Are Hut t'ulliiUai Inllurli?" HWor Uttcrif A'Jus rhechiirclilnlhe Thcalro had tbo abovo question answered yestcrdsy. The preacher stattoi out b eulogizing promluent Infldela lu hlitory. Tlten he denied that UnllarlAiis were lull, dels. At that lnt I looked about for the connection betwi-en n denial of Infidelity and a euligy of liitldcls. Tho s)tiiVcr next dccllml lilmselfby his who'e luatt n Chriitlsn and he gloried lu the crust uf Chrlit. Then he denied He resumctlon of Chrlit;-a.d It added nothing to heller In Immortality He dictated that tho returrettlnu nf Jesus was "Aiiuistlou of literature," and weilll not know any. thing positively lu regsrd tu the New Teitsment(lilt. llellef In Immor-tallly Immor-tallly ha I a broader basis and a Utter I roof than the reiurrcotluu uf Jetut. Thur, after uniting hit heart rs that ho was an oul-inl-out, uti-aml'down Chrlillsn, he turuo.1 about uud declared de-clared lhat the fundamental fact of Christianity was of lio atcouul. It ti nis to mo that 1 1 etcher ou(,l.t tn try akalu He elsieil by a somewhstun chrlillaa referrnielu Ihu fillure of the 'iiu stre manager lo havo tho auditorium auditori-um wanneil and llghlul and an aj, reil to folks tojolu Ihu choir and como lo meeting. LtailNs.it. |