OCR Text |
Show mi num. - "7g ' ' LAND COXIEST CASE.- ProctciIlBg Kcrorc The Keghtrjr anil Itcctlttr This Morning Theca.coftueUt!Ktl Stall Vs. Alfred Thomieon, claimant came on for hearing today before i'legb. trsr the Hon. Frank li. Holto, and 3Ir. Hoyt Shermth, H-celver, nflhc United Steies Land Olllces, First f?o?t!i street. ressrs. Thompson and Stephen, are attorney for the elalmanf Major Bird and Hennettt Jlradluy represented Messrs. Jeremy ,V Co This is a matter iiVvolVicg lol 4 of . 3- - . . S 3 of.S. L". :, and lot i 1 .X V - a" of S:;c-- township, fi.TI,'e,CaSaroe U,,cu a" anJaMt fiW by Thomas J. Aln.y, acting gLmy.t Co., alleging that the Uud sought to be entered by Alfred Tliompn fa notde.-ert UadVi te "'f ;luSf ' ; that it o anj lms been foryrars, njcd for nun". tradu mid Inisiucs-, imrpofes. I ,., presentation of this allidaU Se application to enter iu,!-" aad a hearing nrdere.1, 1!. .-, t for August ato, u J ,, Z, ?J?, ,&"? ra',M'-Itess illnued until todaV. ' at lH ""Wlus.of the court at iu.oO, after some preliminary cou-fV5". cou-fV5". Major Bird moM ut the title of the case bo cliauod from that of the United Stales vAnX-d Thompnn to Alfred Tlionnon vT Jeremy A Co. and ll1B J,, tloi .,Ttl0m:)u "l'tHl Uic mo- u ".J L'kva .Ulat Ule "tie be changed fro that or the Culled ?i? L1 Thompson, claim-SV?";".??8 claim-SV?";".??8 J- AImi" Protestant, v..AiireU Thompson, proteatee. Major Bird opposed tills. Mr. Thompson eventualy consented con-sented to withdraw his motion temporarily, tem-porarily, and desired to state that his objection to the granting of Major Bird's motion v. as based upon the fact that Thomas J. A Iniy et al. were the real protestants in this matter agalu;t the claimant, aud that therefore the chiiige if made In the title of thu case should be made accordingly. The Registrar and lteeiver, after consultation, denied the nntlcu. Major Bird We take eicepllon to the ruling, and now, without waiving nny fshts under our former for-mer molloh. uiove that Jeremy .t Co., t-esiadeaparty to the suit as against Alfred Thnmron and that they be joined with the United States, the firm of Jeremy A. Co. being composed of Thomas J. Almy. ThomaslX Jeremy, jr., and j Levi Reed, doing busines under the firm name o? Jeremy A. Co., in the nia-Sfacture ot salt. i Mr. Thompson opposed this motion, mo-tion, for the reason, he said, that the United States wn uot a proper party j in the proceeding. Ho moved that I Uie title of tlie cause bo Thoaias K. Jeremy, Jr., Thomas J. Almy and i Levi Reed, doing business under i the firm name sud ttyl of Jereuiy . Co., vs. Alftvl Thoinjt-on. The Registrar and Receiver nileil tliat this being a cas-j under tthleh no prefereiu-e right of entry oouM be granted, the cots would be ap- portioned as per rule 55 of Rules or Practice. I At this point the llttt w itlivts was called, but before l.is examination j commcncfd, it wai suggested that as severs' of the Witnesses were a' sent, and for other reasons wliicii were named, it would be advUable to adjourn for thi day and rtvi'me mth tlie taking of testimony on Monday morning. Xo objection beiuz Glft-red, tlie suggestion was adopted. |