OCR Text |
Show Ht-stDistriitCouit. rroccedlDgs before the Mrt at Provo j esteriy rntlieJhlncrfcUitagiuusttlieeili j for jIOOO damage" the jury awardd nothing, as they conaJeosi trt the j damage wj cirCotte'tnrougfi any fault la tec city ditches. i Tiie ac of William ( arroll f Provo City v,-aa called. Mr. Carroll j sues focjK) due him for plan-r.nj fHwciftcations fee a city hail ftr Proi cHy In the latter part of ISS9. Tli reason Tho tfly decline) y. U.pat tor the plans i because the I Cit did Vai accept the 4ans the pJiictTtl rarnlsheii. The plans were j received from Carroll with tueiun- derstaudmr that there wastb be competition. The p'alntitl attempted tJtrjve by the tesLmouy of CarroiKfc Ken- J that Mr. Carroll had given them to understand thai thecompetHroii hu 1 j been withdrawn, but there TV mid I be no e'ujbt that their plans would J lieaccop'ed b the couneil. t |