Show r DS T DIE 1 N JAN 1 18 fOR SlAYING WIFE IFE I Il l ho Attorney Fails in in Attempt to Gain Permission sion Ibn n for New Trial Mon Motion Mo Mo- tion n i Claims Evidence II m I MAN SHOWS VS NO O EMOTION It in inal l Appeal Will Be BeM M Made de to Pardons Board f for fr r Commutation of Sen Sen- nce Counsel Says mI II m- m I n. n Woods must pay the thena thena na t. t tY for the murder murder of ot his wife a tta Woods Wood by being shot t to toa II le a within ln the walls wails of ot the state son on January 18 is T This s was the sentence of ot the thethis urt t this ils morning Imposed by idge Ephraim Hanson pursuant r. r an i opinion cinton of the supreme me court courtl l lg that the conviction of ot ofIn ids gods in the district court on a large arge of ot murder In the first de- de was in accordance with the theand wand and that the death penalty Imposed should stand ocas OOs was before the court for tor forg fixing ng g of ot the date of ot execution i ce before the defendant haben has hab hasen hassen sen en before the court for tor retiring the date of ot execution but each delay for tor the purpose l tips ecu ring advice of ot additional HOWS NO EMOTION od dL standing before the bar eunIce replied to a question of ot ofas court a 8 as to whether he had reason reaton to present why 1 ie e date of ot execution should not note e C fixed informed the court that C ad d not He listened to the theof ord odi of ot the court fixing th the dy death for Jan January of t emotion and n shed led a as all to the method of advised th the court that ai aL elore he would choose shooting IThe Th case calle had been continued un- un 1 this morning for the purpose t f giving Woods opportunity to with Judge J. J F F. 1 ormer er member of ot the supreme ourt of ot Idaho relative to certain hates haes of his case cue When en the case wa was wag called this 1 iping J. J F. F Jr son of I former Idaho Justice appeared I nd ld a asked ked permission to file a I M On n for a no new trial based upon i er tl sin ln new evidence in ln the form torm f Affidavits affidavits which he said the den de- de ai n e would present I IJ J JUDGE GE DENIES AUTHORITY fudge Hanson ruled that under hil of the supreme court Woods WoodIS case his court had no to entertain a R. motion orla orka new trial or to do other than han ban to the time of ot loit oi jI view of ot this Attorney Ailshie nade no further move In the new rl ral l matter and the tho court pro- pro ec ceded ed to sentence Wood It Is un- un however that Attorney will wilt make a R. final appeal to toh toh h board of pardons In behalf of ot s and seek to secure a R. com com- of ot sentence roods is alleged to have murle mur- mur le d his wife we In their apartment 9 9 1 1922 22 and to have at- at to conceal the crime by the bedding I with In- In an A I material t and I d setting t I fire fireL L At the tho time Woods told a atory at ato tory t to of ot alleged robbers entering he apartment locking him In a aIo Io t and murdering his wife Iii i tho the trial the state undertook p ove prove that Woods himself killed and sought to burn the theod theody od ody The Jury found Woods guilty t f i Ie e crime on July 4 4 1922 and andIa ande Ia e was sentenced on July 11 to be beJ J n September 1 I. In the mean- mean Im mg an appeal was taken to the tle premo court which body sus- sus i ind d the action of ot tho lower ourt t. t |