OCR Text |
Show Thiri Distrlrt Omif. The following bitiiiiBsa was traas-aslaiycsterJsy traas-aslaiycsterJsy aAernoc: J-:i!za Cook v. Uuj" ( iregon Sliort iuc. This was an action where-th'e where-th'e plaintiir f-uud fprSJU.i'UO dsm ages caused by tbe death' of her husliaud. . .The juryrendured a verdict ver-dict for ?2;700 inTa vor of plaintlfl. Zion-'- Savings-Baiikw. J. M. Xelkle; judgment for plaintUi. V. J. Caslemau ys. Jtio c;rande Western Itailway; continued. The following-cais cimeJiefore the court to Jay: : " Ezra Thompson et al. p. uaviu Keith 'et nl.; dercurer to supply mental answer submitted; 'Mei'd-anU 'Mei'd-anU move for continuance of trial on affidavit filed. t Howard C Woodrow vs. Cactus Mining Cp.;lendaut:n,ov,ea to am"ndcom).Uint;allowcli: and answer an-swer accordingly. - United Staws vs. bait i-Ahe v Fort DougUn Itailway Cd. anl salt Ikoltacic Co; lKlng of proceedings proceed-ings in coutempt cpntintied until Xoveraber 7tli. . i. |