OCR Text |
Show Third Districl Conrt. IThefulIoTlngbu'lnei was done Udiv B B. B a-k & Co ve. Blaslcbiirn j- dcbalt an! judgment, for j-iiLtifr. Tnitel jius v- suit Jiiko i 3-rn lUiiivav Compmy, fifteen ilij aUJuional to acwer. 'lie f lloa-in were admitted to --nJiij r G beare and A. J. 'sire. TA'ivei) of 1-nglanJ, now of at j mJT G Sutherland, a a r f jtlanJ, now of this city. : Oiji ,i 1in:rtin wasaJmittetl t ij,. 0 tIl p,,, w 5-'i-eof Ilnlet Deciny; order 'aUuonai paoer. on appeal to u r tie clerk of the probate -it f TVeleCountj. t nirj Orover, J-f , vs. George r wdl aMiIication to reinstate iJ ail Tamte disaiisal over rj i " IS i'lap vs. John H. Holers t'"il-6ed forwautof prosecution. i.-5 0 Me VlHster vs. Andrew : s-x-cne trial b the court in pro- crei. I. ( arttr v. H. lu Uall; or-J or-J J"""J':a' the receiver p3j to referee j a- - impensatinn. |