| OCR Text |
Show li WHO IS THE "HIKCKIf AS . iff ? s A I"y registration "Ulcer a 1 Jftagj "Wggeimau" tlian a. Chief Justice- I 4SrPi " ta1' Ccmmitioii anJ the Su- -I Sri3 "J' rarXcmteCtlic CyH"l6tatt ' " afefiB Thatisa.Uwt!Oii wlifc!i ouglittol i-laSHm LlTFctualJy docxin anil tLat frI- Enf!! iIy' The Llal' Ccmmlit!on cai l PaEpfw solve theproMKiiIf It will. Itsme-m- ESrali tiers can (-leak's with no uncertain V SHsHw vofee aadlta. appointees will "come " ttS&lilf to timed" 'SttBi There area number of legal vot- -aa&Mr CTa w '"' 'Vo -eu rabbed of their 'JlfaP 1I3I1U at the polls. The vnjDg has Hre- 'x'cn Jone w,t!j criminal Intent, lj 'SeI croatnrci.ofthe' CommluJou, who wF3S jiresUtutccl tnelr official power in 3r Sjl "."' iu'eret anJ the belictt Of JM S? jWEffil'' managers. This 111! rig has flrMf tojtw itoppeiL The Commitelon J X? cjn ttop it.. Will they do It? jfr-Sjr fiUndut tho rulings of tlicsBurrunc JUkI 'Court of the United States on gen- Bwl 5s principle)), and of the Third ' SkS ItTtrict Court or Utah !n a specific fffiE no citizen can to debarred WMfl from vttlnwliolsnowa monogam- WBm?" 1st or a vridoweT but has been in tal BllsS times jt a poiygamibt. Yet prr- 3 IflijE fol,s apiointed I-y the Utah Com- at!? mi-tion, who have but a little I'hK temporary authority and are subject 3lg; to removal at any time, have Tiad 1 -' 'c JIur'U(-lence5 to override those, j-- 3 judicial decision', for the purpose of JiM Tt'Jr chcatin- lawful voters out of their it luliutsaDil thus aiding their tiolIU- 3H : I- ' c.nl enemies with whom Uios-e Im- W ILv iertlnent officials are in Tolltleal l' 'W 't-ynipatby. iyl j Z1? tau Commission can lu- ' ' ' struct their appointees in relation to I' i ' ' this matter in Rich a way that ro- -i fc spect will vbe paid to their utter- fr'i it ' ances. Or they can seem to do so E'y fir' Wit'1 no e&iTe that what they iay t' "4 W ' WlU lK "P'ltJ with. We khall l?'.i&2-i Kn wJlat wi" l hece for the Xo- KijJ vumber election. sTsL- Z? r 5e Commissioners are really In Wt jrl liannjny with Congreia in a desire i,f 4 to suppress polygamy, they will not tr'A 'oiu i-" or H-'rniit Ulis act of iDjus- P2?f t tice to men who are now clear from B;a ti ' the polygamic stilus. Such a ilftjaJ j-olioyis clearly antagonistic to the" sljJ ' I .ational policy as well as subversive t3t if"J tae "ihU of citizens. Uut if & L t t!fjr Wa"t to l,romote tuo "Liberal" l.fti cau-e, whatever may be the mural, t Iffii' sjtial and legal results, they will ..Sraj' continue to wink at the assumption V'W kW , a!1 iuuU)rJInation of their own "S Jftj appointees and let every petty M M, 5 I regbtrar jxne as "a bigger man Uian rM J GBur" |
