Show A in it nsuEK THE Salt Late Tniund Sunday mornIng tl a column and a half of edit riaiV r wilh further scurrility scur-rility and abuse of the undersigned The wrier of these repeated libels has used his one talent ulgar vituperation vi-tuperation fur several years under eovcrof tlie ZKSwic witKout personal person-al notice freui tnu olject of his assault as-sault He is l too contcmptiblo to name but for the paper which he defiles and too insignificant for rej ply Hut the accusation tnadoiu the Tnlnmc on Frl Jay i repeated In Sunday bu wIt the additional falsehood that the uuderigned han not gafcweriH UiS charge that an n e t n arrnu ement had been entered iiitoffetevutC I V Leamse and Mars1iLIont Therefore the arI IIi TherorJ te folo ntijj paragraph are now copied II from the rejJy which the Tnbimc does nartiOto Wit speaks of as an effort o try to answer without an i bweriogtfi The undersigned s far as he remember re-member never bail but two Inter liews 1 Marshal Parsons and these r a tbo Marshals office In reiatwn to the detention of prisoners f in the penitentiary after their terms bail expired for costs when no fine had keen imposed The Marshal ai plaiaed that ho could not do otbcrn uo than hold them because commitment commit-ment in every ca e ipecifled imprisonment imprison-ment until the costs were pid A writ of lutca eorptu was sued out in one of ibCjSdiawa Bcfuro IudEe Zinc the detalrfM pers ° 1i vas liberated and tho iMarsKaT tticn agreed that snch penonssliould be diwbargcd on the rlon l f o oxprratToo of their resi < ecijvo torm nba Pone nofer asked C W Penrose to elo auything respecting t ia rsplns the affidavit referrci to or in regard t hjyssnfirmition or in rg liKoffloe < or the efforts tooutmm lie iiorerteateroJ Uito any arrangement arrange-ment of uuiy kid whatever nIt C I I W Fenro i itmless th promise to do ill o J gi3 to the discharge c I peisxtoJt aflerthoir terms expired can I < b < 1 dcau Arrangement There la I not any foundation or excuse for the libel uttered by the Tribune which wustitrabUeK suggested by tbo same individuals who hare endearored intimidate perrons unwilling to join iu their scheme Ju tills mornings Tnlatnc an at 1 tin jit was made t sraootli ocr a imirlent libel published some time ago respecting as alleged occurrence in Fillmore The writer of the tcandal now saye It was one of those cases where a person becomes convinced 1 las own mind while the evidence would not 5Y3rritt arrant tbo presumption This may be the Trunci condi tloiilu the present case Jlut from the course it has pursued for cvcral yeare in relation to undersigned heteof tficorHnlon that millce and loendaeity prompted this DeW e liooJ w hich at the proper time and in tlie right pttHo hewill be f und ready l dny uuileT caih As Its useleootoodisoute wi bison who never airytmevtg an ort or-t tbCul blates his position he will not further notice iu these column ucfa lersonal calumnies Init as heroioforc wlir treat them vIUi tlleut contempt CHAKLHS V P BOSE |