Show MORE OF THE CHALLENGED The Heglstrars Stilt AtWork ytir Notice = fojn OsP1j 1 j Tro ftegklrara courts were In opcraUon again today and the wa nothlngto vary the order that has bjien followedfor some days Before Be-fore Mr McCallum AusUa Shlpp tyjio was ajKiIygamist eleven ycsre ago appeared and llo I care was taken under dement In the case 0 Jolm B Almon who had 133t been a polygaml telnce 1862 the challenge was denied Wm H Ccylor did not respond I when lain name was called arid id Investigation isli0 ° vi thAt hehad not beeu rtbOi i with notice of the I chxltcuge Default w as entered against George I Burton fornon appearance i There were unite a nnmbtrfci J Icnged for non duhc most of whom htTc lived lathe city jnte cty may years One of these was A H Vole > who wuen askpd how long he had resided in Salt Lake replied STycars He I 27 years old Default a entered against Gus ave Jacob en on Saturday Today njyoung man appeared before Mr McCaUma and sd I amGustave Jacobscn and I learn by the tspvta that default waseuUreil against me on February i eutraginst gt na tice yesterday afternoon He lce Jtcn aernon was challenged for not being a bona fide citizen He has lived in the city for four years past Tho default was setalde and WuchaUcnM VlWltd As a sample o hew hb services are made and OvfitoH Ic following atances will show Chas ValukiuVst was entered a maid ing at J2o IIleeuth > JIast and the notice returned no such and on there His residence was at tn 525 tame street Vro IX ttadley was placed at 6 1 Third East Street a vacant lot and this fact rt was hcinldtxl t show that time eutrj was 1 Crud Mr Hadley lives at 6ono block south and the mistake mis-take was thu registrars There a a number of cases where iJmHar errors have been made Before Mr AVfntt 1 there Wcren defaulters The case of Clans E Tailor who was ji polygamlsl2 4 i years gI Was taken under advise r meut Several new notices were Issued notc loe by Mr Winters today Before Mt Morris there was a repetition el tho CU ptogtirume Two of tho cases ten Ut Jtrnd vhement r thoti e J ayorFran cis Armstrong vrhV was a polyga mist fram IiI to Jbi > 3 and AM 5jedlagltni who was a polygamist on jsar Jrom 1S73 to 1871 Of those who were challenged for nonres deuce the majority had resided here from two to twenty yenta The following failed to answer t their name Ethan A PpUll E win UdolMi Jolin > t Cannon and rgU Wagferg August Bar ho was before Beg Utrar Morris last Saturday to 1boW cur why his name should not b stricken from registration littli having been charged by D Webb I with being jx polygamit and nonresident non-resident i and who predated SUdS evidence that the challenge was overruleduad another notice served upon him i esterday to appear before the same official a charge of po lygimy lan been preferred I against him by one ROGShowell I Mr Baer so only just turned twentyone years of ago and i unmarried I un-married v It is expected that arguments will morrow bo made before the registrars to |