Show Xrcro Colanlzjtllon OUO Axx ABnoR MIca April IAn interesting debitu was held this evening in tile law lecture room of the Michigan University between students representing Chit law and literary departments the question being whether or not colonization of Urn negro would b for the bee Interests ort United State The judges were professors of tho faculty Their decision was in the negative Among points argued by the students for the affirmative were The Inferiority of the colored race from biblical and scIenUfic standpoints point j evil must result from ming ling superior and inferior races under tbe same government lie extermination or amalgamation of the colored race is I manifestly impossible im-possible hence colonization i tiC only solution the negroes removal would settle the Southern question and put an end t the present lack ofprosperity the South In L beria hew ouU h hL own master and would civilize Africa The ttudenU arguing In tho nega tee held that compulsory colonize toln would tw unconstitutional and I I law foroptlonal colonization would I 0 necessarily IneOltttve Granting Grant-ing comtllutlonality the cost ol removal would b excessive rene re-ne Is an American citizen entitled en-titled to the rights of citizenship Remove him and the cotton Indu try of the South would futrer Irr orable harm Theyargued Clint he lj J Is advancing morally aud Intellectually I Intellec-tually i |