Show A HUGE STEAL Sought to be Perpetrated By the Liberal Parly S TIlE REGISTRATION OFFICERS Overrule the Ulali CotdmUitoa Judge Xanfj and the J UNITED STATES SUPHEM C COURT la the Plat 10 Hob the Jlsjorllj nl tOe Xexl Elrelian No doubt exists in the mindset tbe public as to tho fact that there Ins stupendous scheme on the part of tho Liberals to gain the elec tlou Un February Jo by any means at their command And ni thefts Is no prospect of doing it fairly there is no hesitancy in adopting foul play This is plainly apparent from the fraudulent names on the registration list thb wholesale challenging of those hnojrn 16 bo Peoples Party volets the rulings of lie registrar I and n dotcn other action of the pttrty which manlpulatcslhe electiou machfntfy But the trlckeryjias been so clo t Jy I watched by the Peoples Party who aro contending for their rights that in order to accomplish their bate purpose tbe moot shameless and barefaced dkf cgard of right has to be eihibllcdj afjd tills e ns to be I done witliodt tile JciStco lIltJne lIl while at lie sanje time the jwrpcfra ton AlP afeyflBa W wftut to do what Is rlghh We want Id ft fair etc but whatever they may profits te l want their actions aro tufllcient to show what Uiey are really after Were sent out more than 700 challenges already Add more are going was the statement made today to-day Of this iiumberZllare iu the riritPrteiinti I ThbJittIJ Precinct has Uie least while tho otticr 111 fee are about lull The new notices that are going out stem to ben I chiefly be-n the Second Precinct and are ni d > reW treble b forfa lleabtrar McCallum In the proceedings before Be < is trots CeCtllumlIorrls and Winters today when the persons challenged were called and required to be sworn without even tho opiiortu city of being confronted by the challenger the Peoples attorneys objected that orderj and cited the ruling of the Utah Commission list iJo tie cWooY proof should W on the electors But that did not suit the purpose of tho registrars BO the opinion of the Utah Commission was taken under advisement Tho challenged parties were compelled com-pelled to proceed under the old order Thus the Utah Commission was overruled Then MIMIS Powers and Uicksotl appeared for the Liberal party and argued the case or rather elated what they wanted and they got it the proceedings going on iu the camo order Before Registrars McCallum and Morris tIle order of questions was about tIle same as jtsterday the great bulk tiring Ukeu under ad vlVmenl1 Those who were called before Registrar Wiuters were somewhat annoyed by the insolent tone In which the registrar asked his questions ques-tions Some cUiicIUdU that he did not know any bitter but he dow and can be very mild and gentle times tlmIn a general way his line of qurs toning wax on tho matter or the challenge and those whoso residence l resi-dence III tie city dated back less I than a year were given a rigid examination ex-amination and their cases taken under advisement In regard to litlzcnship the following fol-lowing are rumpled 1 A Mr Peterson said he was fouf i years old when ho came to Ibo country and had never himself been naturalized BegLtrar Your name will be stricken from helloS The attorney for the Peoples Party inquired whether Mr Peter sonVfallier had been naturalized before lie eon wna of age fOh yes replied Mr Peterson Begistrar Well that will It taken under advisement BichardBniythwaslioru injlub lie His father taa an American citizen and his parents hdd tune to Ireland toH about some pmp erty which his mother was heir to In the Third District Court Mr Sm > th had been informed that ho was a citizen under these circumstances circum-stances lIe had also secu his atliers naturalization papers when ho was small boy and remembered that they were Issued In Lowell Massachusitt His father had nerved In the American navy These facts he could proVo hy witnesses wit-nesses now in tile Territory The registrar 1 said that the naturalization natu-ralization of Mr Smyths father e asa as-a record rinL coull only be proved that way He hId Mr Smyth to get a copy of the record and took the mao under advisement advise-ment lDenTbe ccstcosc that came up however how-ever takes the premium It was that of Henry Pure of tlie Twen turtle Ward Mr Puzey testified in effect I am not a polygamlst the ground of challenge have never been 1 practical polygamist though I have had two wives My first len me nnd afterward in 1S63 wlloutgettingadivorcc I married again In a few years the tint wife died and learning my status under the law I made tbe second wife my legal wlfo by marrying marry-ing nalni have never been convicted con-victed of pclyifafny end never lived with two wives have neVer been amnestied Itegbtrar Winters may as well tubtll i Jc lift decide this and all other like casts right now Mr Puzciy is objected to on the ground that lie is a polyg amfet Fhite law oflSG2t1I That even wenbathiic a hud wife llTlnr who itall marry any alter Pr fro on whether married or tiojcle I In TenS lorr ot taO rtitid sUttl ot ethtr plans ant chit lbS tinted States hate ei elslelnnsdieftos shall be cIjad at P I1DlT Iotldd certiUiein that Ibis fetllon iill not extend to anjpenoa bT Taos of lOT fonarr zaamaice Trbote ban band or vita bj tuch nanuce bill bare been sliest for Hie merciilte yeas Tntbont tug sees 10 lack JITII I a tlmetoMllTluz norlo La person bVfotsa Ct nOtIces r tear t lf tf nag which chat bare intO dittolrco tj the decrea of a e nip teatrocrtnortoaD7 pmaatirieaion ot a ij forest marriage which ball hate beta annnlled or pro lIooated ystS byibe lenience or de of a comr tml court eo the round of tbe ash Itjr ef the marriage contract Tilt Puzey you do not need to be nTftltola convicted ze1 polygamy The law has adjudged you guilty You area are-a polygamist not having been pardoned iu doned amnestied Section 0 of the law of Slid sayc That Ibe President Is I bereby nlbor toyeantoaneslyionuch eiioiescfaoad era guilty 0 bifoot polygamy or onLoatnI r1 J = otni cobs italian beioee ux pauagt of thu act oniachcoadiUons and under inch limitation limita-tion u be hill think proper Dot ao ionS mcolytall ban ctiectoicn the 01141 Uoa thereof lball be t9mple4 Wiib I Mr Puzey you will not be allowed al-lowed to vote Your name will be stricken from the list on the ground that you are a polygamist The challenge is sustained This ruling will govern all cases like this B W brIggs Jr who appeared for tne People before HegMrarWln Ur > Mr Registrar you have overruled over-ruled Judge Zanet The registrar only smiled Mr Drigqs And the Supreme Court of the United States tool Another smile That was all Tho opinion of Judge Zone cited by Mr DrIgc was gIven in the Bennett case when Judge Powers endeavored to utab lith the position taken by tile registrar regis-trar Judge Ziao ruled that 1 man must actually have a plurality of wives to btji polygamist The fact of cohabitation js not afcatuto in determining the meaning the term A man ceases to be a polygamist when he fully and finally terminates tile relationship Pardon and amnesty are 1 not Intended In-tended as a means of terminating a polygamous relation Pardon Is the remission of the consequences of an ofletivs after the parties hate been convicted Amnesty Is the remission remis-sion of the consequences of a crime and may bl after or before conviction convic-tion Though pardoned the defendant de-fendant might I be guilty of maintaining main-taining and recognizing the polyga niotis relation TJiB dtiif Ion of UieSuprcme Court oi 011 ilfJ of the United Blnte which the registrar override say lit Itso r ee of Murphy against lie Utah Commission Com-mission MIJ 10 nit therefore beetme the penis hu mnuUed the offeue of lunar or polTgamr ome prerlom Ume In i lolatlai ot tone txUtlnit > Utote and at an a < WI tonal DanUbmeot for tu comrnuiton that be II ditrancbied liT the ate of Coairti orJltrch1I Jnor bccsuw be It nllt of Uie offense a > domed and pnnlfhetl tr IhetwiiMcf tbitlct but beaie at Mine iso bullet entered into S WnmoMor l Itiimoal idatloa b > I umbra with a rr terondor tend wire I stile ISo Inst wa list be cliii stntaioS it aid biJ sot 10 u dtasloni Ii nithosgi foe lbs UrnO sief h relttti actual cohlWbtlo 10 bit oso II btljtatJ sbflal fries acinol I esbdbiC C5 Ji sod 5 whaiaaobaetenobwonosI oej01750 edit lie t311 oal leLO to be esCnflhS 110 bu fialIy diosCised in ionic 1Iue maan abcS a are ant called bees tD point nt lb very felIoa of SeaSonS to arsenal WT < which enniUtatei the fortid den aSia he hii prevlon lj ai < amei 11Ie difnanbtiemUitePeniICO POD the uiIJr UI and condI ef the tuon 505eOtlfsfl5pa11llCiiiO hlislbenetone rt7t etroipecUfe He Llmt U dtpnio of V1 Oteitfenitren lie offer to it in Her u thus In the lute or coidtuon of a LlmmJtt Or lyciMiu or li lien ccluallj rcbililUn tllll more baa onewoioxib THiis till matter RoesA rflMe cf derisIon uicct ° thin law In the case A long list of new lfkefri lire now being served A moll tire number cited to appear Is Reconl cr II M Well whose teat ment by BegUtrar Winters on a farmer oceailonwill be remembered Anptlier ono that would seem ver Jute ft Joliti svvru It nit for the Ii fact that t ljo Itifatn of lie Liberal Lib-eral procwdlogs U so well known Ii the Enmrnoning of Sl > enctr Claw soil tb1 1 pIes candidate for mayor to nppcnr wfore llijgbtrar Winters anti show duStS Hilt hb name should nt bo stricken dill the registry list on tiC groulld that ho IB a polygamkt I Many of tliow challenged have failed tu nppenrnnddcfault been entered against them Investigation iIpwS list lira return Is a substitute lf wJ ili luFetcfWiC tile law require a personal Service and in this MiUtl tlite t business it is likely that tile pefvttsclialleilsed and who failed to appedr have tierer tewltrd outlets at nil There Is one noticeable occurrence occur-rence which challenged parties thould take coguizancu of and hat Is list the registrars have no right to ask questions that do not relate to lie matter of the clialllnge Tliat is I If n man Is challenged ou the ground cf nonresidence he cannot be required to answer Inquiries about some one ete who lives In ccrtalh hotrsc or anything except as to his residence and Intention Inten-tion relating thereto The plan adopted by challenger 11IVe t l O II Webb I of lie Liberal committee com-mittee makes its purpose plain Objecting to such men as rl B CUwbon WFXesleu Matthews W McDonald John Walsh Iud hdndred of others on the ground of not being boua fide 1ftlltP when some of them were born add have Jived In Bait Lako City their whole lives and others have resided here twenty to forty years and have been before the public indicates IJllrlooC entirely foreign to that whIch the law contemplates iu al lowingchallengcs The plot thickens new features develop and everything paints to thn fact that no means will be left unused to obstruct tho People Party voters on the day of election 14 well as tuljject them to annoyance and Indignity prior t lien to |