Show TIE COL < IKA 0 UTE KEJIOVAL 1 I I TllJlcaJiDI ACti oroWD paper published In this city lias beennlring Its iirnorance nnd vcntins Its venon la relation to the proposed removal of tho Colorado Utes to the Sail Juan country l baited In the southeastern south-eastern J art of this Territory After I I making coploui extracts from tho I Springfield JtepiScan It follows up this labor ot the cizzsrs and paste 1 pot with the following dish of intellectual intel-lectual hotchjtotcli l enave copea the Hoove to snow what faith our ffruat Government has shovrn wih thoe Indians and what i means wero used by tho Colorado li dlt ers to obtain tho consent of the Indians to a removal Tho whole business has been bass and cowardly in the extreme but there are two phases the cac that the article does cot mention One h I that by some arrangement ar-rangement the Colorado men have acnred the Mormon chiefs in this Territory Ter-ritory to consent to the transfer which of cour will stop all opposition from Delegate Came and insure his corrrt If not open support of iho measure It would mean the building of a savage sav-age wall between Northern Utah and Colorado and would be an unmitigated unmiti-gated hardship upon this Territory for which there Is no possible excuse iloreover it would result in tho direct robbery of many tcUlers who have located on the lands that tho generous gener-ous Colorado men propose to give tee savages The business should bo killed in Congress and the Govern meat ehonld kee its treaty obligations 7 obliga-tions UuALeut I About tno degree of good faith on the part thoGoierument in its I S treatment of tho IndUns and theo the-o mtions of the Colorado land sharks we have nothing to say be cau = e however little poetry there be in these miy charges We arc not Iireparcd to stole that they do not contain strong elements of S truth As to any consent being given to tho removal by any one 5 Interested In tno Mormon settlement settle-ment In San Juan County there is not a grain of ground for the asser tion which is not only intrinsically 1 absurd but bears that r asjiect upon its face The removal S iris 5 been fteadiJy fought by the represents tics of the settlers but it is discovered discov-ered that like every other movement move-ment In which InJians or Mormons S Mor-mons are tIle proj scd victims it is Inevitable The settlers Mormons and Ji8ailormon ara about to be S deprived of their homes established by great toll and labor and compelled com-pelled to seek other IDCItlons They are now cadeaoringin the event of their compulsory exodus tn induce the bwlrnment not to au1ject them to this deprivation without nccord Ulew compen5ltion jic sjuon somewhat approaching the alue of their im lovemeats Nothing wouU suit them bettor however than to be allowed to remain in peaceable pos session of their homos to which they Lave S naturally become greatly aaidiad tho country being a fairly good one all reports to tho contrary S uiHTithstanding The erection of a savage wall Ittnn I X Xortieru Utah and Cobra do is a lhyslcallwpoSolLlfityO impossibility re far as relates to the proposed removal of tile Utes the San Juan Country belug located on the extjgpie south eatera bunlcr of Utah If the re thorn is to be an S unmitigated hardship upon this Territory ione will feel it with greater force than tile Mormon settlers who are In the overwhelming S majority In the region of country immediately inS In-S tented This rhftcrical wall UO UDllhls uiauvantage to them It places n disagreeable terrier between the settlements In south austere Utah from those located inS J In-S San Luis Valley due cast on the Southern Colorado border S x Though diflering on many reins as a rule from our rabid unreason S ablttand vituperative cotemjwrary in the matter of a desire to see the p mtnsuro in qutetion killed in Con gross it can Incite no coutroverv with Uf I |