Show C KILLINGS registration urlce corpus case Monda mua proceedings were bayun yesterday in the first district court against rowland brown to compel eald registrar to outer apon the registration lists tha name of andrew sproul mr sproul beta forth that on oct 4 1895 ha went bedora eaid pared to take all nece gaary required and registration habeas corpus proceedings have been beann in the first Diati ctr court shariff lloya of carbon cownty to com pel him lo 10 bring lonis fountain and J D smith before his honor smith and fountain were arrested at price utah charged with arson by fira to the price advocate printing office and were bald to await the action of tha grand jury and in default to secure bondsmen chiy were sent to jail ah brownlee ona of the ad locate crew baa filed the cor ana and alleges that at the hearing of fountain and finith nofa sufficient evidence waa introduced to warrant their being held to the grand jury mary E rawson ha fied a suit against the meadow irrigation co and annie M Sor or the recovery of actual damares dama ees and for 1000 exemplary damages and for of suit alleged to have absen by tha defend enta withholding certain wa ter righta which plaintiff claims she was to lars M oien has filed a euit against E W mcantire for the collection of a judgment of 50 and costs formerly at aided plaintiff in the first district court george A lowe has commenced suit against mona peterena Peter eoa for SO balance alleged lo 10 be due on judgment him against defendant in august 1895 athe emery county mercantile co haa commenced suit isaac A kimball for with interest and costs alleged to be due on a ju dement rendered in bis favor against eaid defendant by the first district court in the huntington Hunti neton mercantile alon baa commenced suit against J H killpack and mary A kilpack for the recovery 0 with interest from oct and cobb and attorneys fees the principal io alleged to be due on a promissory note secured by mortgage the emery county mercantile co baa began auit against st V liehr for balance alleged to be duo on a iud Kment rendered by the first court against defendant in july 1891 also for interest on same and coatti of suit |