Show Is ilick jhb MASSES SUFFER this tim ahey are told what must eat c rover the wise t ENQUIRER washington march 31 the follow ing veto has been ade to the house of I 1 return without my approval dicu e bill no 1600 entitled an act to allow common people to use either wheat or corn for bread within the united states my strong desire to avoid un guasa would lead me to approve this hill ii I 1 could believe belie Vt that it might not lart in ome email degree to a return prosperity how vr as 1 am unable to satisfy thai the proposed legislation is either wie or jut my conception of the ou liga tiona I 1 owe to my private and to the interest of my few in new york nho put up the funds for my election and my debaie to protect and promote t e gereral interests of people induced mac to send in this veto the and disturbance which have oer o er this country since doiy elevation to this position ia unparallel in its ae verity and conse junces jUn among the causes for our distress it ft as generally conceded that tee law allowing a partial use of corn bread aa food was largely to blame tula led to repeal of that pernicious lave on the ast 1st day of november 1893 ach d balieu BO low in the use of corn bread that our rapid recovery could not e reasonably expected our recovery lias s progressed 1 ick wani and more men are out of employment the wheels ol 01 industry which have beau doting slowly ahtye stopped stop pod I 1 holicke holic ve the under consideration become a law that ii would bol be biety days until those fanatics would insist that 1 even 1 eat corn bread in this venerable house where misguided pre lecea eora have hean proud to eat it aad given it to it ib that atie piu videt anat any cit zon can eat corn or bhea bred but what do vre care for the in this day and we are aifer than the framers of thas ahny did noi have any rich men in thane days who were able to dictate cven to a president ol 01 the united states it aed to be that wheat was worth 1 30 per bushel and corn pei beahe but now behold wheat IB worth GO corn SO acta per bubbel and et the granger ia not happy it now becomes me to point out some more specify abid more weighty object objections bill consists of two ec liona the arat lection provided pr ovidea that citizens can wheat nour for bread but it does not eay said people shall bao the fine flour or the chaise nor does it brand of flour be used ane second section provide that may ube corn meal foi bread but doea not specify whether ii shall be batted or not ner does ii whether the corn used in preparation 0 eaid meal shall be chiu or yellow corn therefore eaid bill is fatally defective in my estimation am 1 think the common people had better gi without bread until joeress Jo can daei a better and mare law on th subject tha entire bilt is most un constructed nearly ever lenience presenta prea enta uncertainty and in hiie as to its meaning am intent lean id it I 1 belaev ii ahe secretary of the treasury to indue bonde and buy u all ane in the country clu and hav n gr mod by wa I 1 street BO that we would lauw it was properly bolted and the aca ku properly marked then it liht be bat to let the peaple make a lit ie coin breal to prevent starvation but in rhe maa m aa lie I 1 am exi remel s ilici toua whatever ne take on tans eulaj it may be such aa to prevell the common herd from havice too much of either wheat or corn bread at home and that our friends abroad neav be assured that ve aref till lavioe on attic fanett here and ou wail estreet bignel big ned |