Show LOW MAKK it has finally been lipon by both sides yesterday afternoon was largely con in the utah lase low water mark suit in hearing tea on how the monument at lehi was bishop rawlins francis armstrong and elias smith gave on this point and they said aitkin and madsea also agreed the monuments had been accurately placed judge EA smith waa aked do yon nag been the practice of the commission with reference to allowing canal companies to place planks in the jordan dam until the gatei compromise point this was objected to by the defense but the answer was allowed by tha court subject to argument and a ruling on the aada later the answer was that until the water reached compromise point the canal companies were allowed to put in planks at their pleasure francis armstrong isreal evans and bishop rawlins corroborated that version all having been commissioners peter reed testified that he had tak en out planks put in by canal companies when ordered by the commission john D T me mister also had carried out the order of the commission when it desired planks removed further objection bv defense brought out the fact by judge sutherland that this was a suit at equity to prevent a of suits if it succeed all defendants will be enjoined from furr ther damage suits this morning the attorneys elated that chev believed that they could arrive at an understanding that would materially narrow if not settle the case and they asked that the court give them time for consultation an adjournment was taken until 2 this afternoon this afternoon both sides submitted that they had on the low water mark it is two inches below the lehi monument and on a level line run around the lake from that point NEW CASKS W J letts has begun a suit of foreclosure against john H jones et al for secured bv land at richfield pleasant grove hag begun suit against joshua holman claiming he refuses to pay 7 SO water assessment on 39 acres of land owned by him A similar corn plaint ial made by the same city against artemus holman for 1480 assessment on 74 acres of land daniel hamer F S brereton and G F phillips complain that on dec 24 1894 they entered into an agreement with one orrin rockwell to bev certain lands in utah county for if he would guarantee a good title which he did and was made plain tifis now complain that A Y mowry and wife are in possession of the lands and refuse to give them up and plain want a decree of ownership |