Show but no decision is M tea BLAIRS BAD democrats did not want to investigate his writing arguments the examination of the in taft sanpete election basea was ed yesterday yet erday chairman letcher was exam ined at areat leneth on a prepared table of hypothetical discrepancies by john zane how such cies as letcher were possible without mistakes on tha part of the I 1 adges the chairman confessed tha possibility of such mistakes as cat oat george E blair the accused than took the stand and denied emphatically rat locks testimony implicating him in thi forgeries do you know anything about these crosa maras alleged to have been made in different colored in was asked 1 I do not 1 I will abow the word voted written opposite tha name of A E scott in mount pleasant precinct and ask you if he wrote it 1 I did not did you ever handle this book not junices I 1 handed it to one of the corn missions ra at acme time on cross examination he was asked yon knew that the yota was close in sanpete county yes when did yon first find it out when the discrepancy table wa made out do yoa know a man named grennan yes did you ever have anything to do with him in connection with ballot boxes 1 I did not did yon ever get a key from hin to the commission no daiil he ever ask von to get him a key no shadid you first hear say that there were discrepancies iu toe returns from sanpete conaty con nty johnt caine in the commission room joseph cohen denied handling any of the returns commissioner norrell testified that he gnp iv of no chansiya chans iea being male ma le in the returns commissioner thatcher gives similar testimony F D richardi and geo W park told of how the returns were kept in the eafe of the secret arya office this closed th a testimony for the ae bense and in rebuttal mr zane wanted out on a number of IV hat loi asked mr williams they are called as experts on band mr zine answered after which mr williams objected to the tee emony being given on the around that it haip not rebuttal judge zane insisted that they bad ane right te introduce intro duca the testimony aa they expected to show by it that the complained of were francc jude that the petition era had no right to introduce expert testimony after the respondents bad and if so the respondents would hive the right to lut aduce experts UD oo 00 the other side of ane question and the matter would gee saw back judge miner inserted ins eted anat they pecked to show that mr blair wrote the word voted previously testified to and in addition trev owed it to themselves and to the accused to intro Juco testimony blaring upon the point mr williams was also heard and at the close of his argument judge bartch sustained thy objection mr zana then stated to the court that they expected to by heber M wella J E dooly W a mccornick F D kimball M J SJ Kenyon and J H bacon that the word voted whitten opposite the names of richard orather 0 han aon ar and james hendrickson Hendrick aon on the list the word voted written opposite names of andrew T bread ard martin H ephraim bansen edwin F bensun and chaa stevens on the ephraim registry list the word voted written opposite the jamea of samuel aames william scott and joaquia andrews in on the moroni list the word voted written the nama of A E scott on the mount pleasant list and the word voted written opposite the name of joseph F bagwell on the registry list are not in the same as the other words voted written opposite other jamea of voters upon chere registry lists we further to show said mr rdoe by the earned that the word voted written opposite the name of A E scott on the mount pleasant registry list and the word voted written opposite the name of richard on the gunnison Gunn registry are both in the same handwriting and are both in the same handwriting and writing as the writing in the record of the utah commission which is admitted by ane witness blair to be in his own hand writing judee powers to that we object on the that ic is incompetent am material and irrelevant nd second that it is not prod r rebuttal testimony duurt tbt objection is sustained exception may be taken arguments were then commenced end were still in when we wint to andge miner opened for plaintiffs williama followed for defense yesier STILL balt LAKE jan 9 john M zane and judee powers emoke abi a mornine hiles is now court for ahe the deciano i la noi expect d to ba given till after third precinct case is heard |