Show CouL COURT ZW court at neplir and logani ning suit buit the following business was yesterday transacted transact edin in the supreme court COURT AT AND LOGAN judge zane ruled as aa follows in the matter of the holding holdina of the district court at logan utah in the fourth fourt h judicial district find and at nephi utah in the first judicial district the act of congress in force june 1888 1883 def de dares that the times and places as a 9 now fixed by the statutes of said eaid terri tarr 1 tory for holding court therein shall sha il remain until changed by law 2 the territorial law in force March lOth 1892 after designating the coant counties fes which shall compose the various judicial districts of the territory provides all cayiea cau iea both civil and criminal in alich the caurie caitie of action shall arise ariee in eiter the coun counties tivi constituting the districts as hereinbefore named shall be heard beard tried and determined date F in id such district at such time and place as the governor way may by proclamation fix I 1 provided that in all cases a change of the place of trial may be allowed as is or may be prescribed by law in pursuance of that law the governor ii sued hia proclamation bearing date th t tic day of april 1893 and fixes me ire place for holding the first second and fourth terms of the district court in the district in which ogden is shua ted at that place and the third teim beirn is appointed at logan to be held on the first monday of september the a iso also designates the first second and fourth terms of court in abo first judicial district at provo 0 v 0 11 and the third term at nephi in t that b t district on 0 the that monday of bettem her ber the court is of the tha opinion and so holds that the act of the territorial legislature Legis latura of march ath 1892 1992 is valid and that the proclamation of the governor issued in pursuance thereof fixing the times and places for holdin holding 9 the courts mentioned in the Dro proclamation clama dionis is by authority of law and there is no legal objection to the holding of the courts at login at the time and place named and at nephi at the time and place named JURT FANSTA the case of samuel bennett vs va tin tic iron co appellant an action to recover for or personal injuries alleged to have been sustained dy by plaintiff while engaged in the iron mi mines nes at gintic tintic was argued the case was tried iu in judge black bums court at provo on may of the present year prior to that day the regular jury panel hak hae been discharged but bat the court made an order for the special venire issued tor for sixteen persons to berve as jurors in the trial of the cause to which the defendant excepted challenging the entire panel and now appealed |