Show 11 1 1 z 2 ti I 1 I 1 i A ii I 1 IN t N a go geo 0 whitmore to pay damages THE 0 CASE I 1 defendant need not pay up UD his stock brodie fails to got get damages AFTERNOON the case of lorenzo pace et al vs geo 0 0 whitmore et al was submitted to the djury jury in the 9 case of james chipman vs hyrum adamson a suit bait brought to recover an account due for mr merchandise chan judg judgment menI was waa rendered fo tor plaintiff the case of the payson canning Can niD creamery dairy co vs wallace F clank was called and a mr gash represented plaintiff ard gome sutherland defendant defea dant the complaint alleges that defendant sub for the shares of stock istock of 10 per share for the encouragement and aad 0 organizing r qan izing of a ca canning i creane creamery erv and dairy cr c madany t to 0 be established at that on january ath 1892 said stock stock was vil as declared due and that on ic peb b ury uary aith 1892 defendant was wait notified that said eaid stock wasi was due and that mat at that time he ha had paid part of his bis and refused to do so BO the defense denied each and every al allegation leia tion FRIDAY the jury in the payson creamery cai binga dalry dairy go co ya Vs W P F chrz asa a suit it to compel payment of acad ac td subscribed stock returned a verdict for defendant the jarv in the cis casci of lorenz apace pace et al vs george geora C whitmore Whit mare et at al re rb turned a verdict for plaintiffs against george 0 whitmore tor for JOO head of sheep to the value oi bead of gumbs to the value of P and 1125 1123 for damages ilam agea sustained no cause causa of action against tho the other defendant S the tha case of charles foote vs ve john whitbeck was called descendant Desen Deien dant movi amov 5 ed to td ais missi misa motion 0 overruled and exception taken the suit is brought to secure the payment of an alleged aen account of A jury was ampa em paneled n bied r and ud vii i nesses were exam examined loed the tha case casenas wai submitted to the jury and a verdict for plaintiff returned A jury was paneled em in the caise of W F vs tintic gintic range ry co the plaintiff sues to recover 2500 for damage sustained on account ol oi defendant corporation torp oration constructing 3 grade and railway on a street of whit h li was part owner in front of bis ill pro PO hereby making ingers in rs pid p id arees difficult the cutting down f i row w of shade trees and tits te t e ti risi ui 0 of f L ut u t by the smoke from loc c e i the olain tiff ia represented resented b booth and and th debei d ant corporation by J A marshall court took a recess until 2 |