Show amm DISTRICT IN COURT mrs anna marks is there again ifrain I 1 SHE sae IS NOT GUILTY of flourishing a deadly weapons Wea ponA spanish fork water case the jury in the case of the people vs charles durango grand larceny was instructed and ana retired they returned in I 1 a an hour with a verdict of guilty and and a recommendation to mercy the curt court sentenced him to one years im to begin at the expiration of tho the term he is now servina servins ser vins vinz MRS MARKS IN COURT mrs marka of eureka is in court once azain as gay and blithe as ever she ia a this time charged with exhibiting a 1 I weapon in a rude and threatening threatens threat eni ne manner at eureka on february 1892 1802 john B cronin is the complain inz ins witness the case was brought up from pikes court on a appeal W H kins her favorite attorney is defending her mr cronin was the first witness he is a great big troad broad shouldered t mn man about a year ago he said he bought piece of ground of judge dana about 16 or of 17 feet for the purpose of building a abo aho eshop he started to grade the ground foi the shop sho when 11 mrs marks and two men ca came in e up and told him birn to stop she claimed to have hava three feet in there she hit him with her fist a number of times but he nian strike her as he considered it would be ungentlemanly to lilt bit a woman she then pulled a gun out of her pocket and and sid 8 yu big bellied irich s of a b ill blow a hole through you big enough to a eat cat through lie he then seized lied lie by bv the wrist and she abe fell down yellin bellins murder and everything like that mr air bronosky boronosky Oro Uro came and took her pistol and lie he isto longo of her she slapped him in the lace several times sitar after be let go of her louis gronosky Gron oaky formerly fot merly mrs mira starks marks clerk who sund her for hi bai salary testified that he bad come upon I 1 the scene when mrs marks was lying in in an ash pit and brinin was bend bending 1 ng over her holding her by the wrist he told cronin that taa sas no dav to treat a lady and to let her up witness tok her ristol pistol and cronin allowed her to lo wrise tn in answer to the query by mr zane if her breath smelled of lifur he said na no sir mrs U arks lever i drinks in cross examining the wit witness mr king asked it if he be t unfriendly to mrs marks ou on w count of losing his suit against her t to anich the witness replied xo no sir air I 1 believe to the victors belong the tha spoils I 1 she won the suit and im satisfied several irish citizens citi offered corroborative testimony A smart young man testified for tho the defense mrs marks marics had a threefoot three foot walk fenced in and gronosky had bud started to tear the fence down b mr r r marks protested against the destruction ot of her proper property tv and gronosky seized her by the wasta wn sta and threw her down she did not have any pistol in hir hand witness was enre of cf this arg starks was put on the and offered similar testimony to that f of i the last witness AN ARRAION arraignment MENT edwin chalk wa arraigned on a charge of iod allseed to have been committed with florence goldiez at richfield on august 1 3 he any money to employ an attorney eo mr woods was appointed appoint ad id to defend him rOBB edner chalk pleaded not guilty 0 o the charge of fornication john barlowe and martin jeffs were made citizens of this great graat republic they were formerly citizens cit izena of great britain MRS MACKS CASE the marks case wits was resumed mrs mra marks testified that she ebe come came out and took hold of a post with her hands handa which cronin and his big associates were dig digging ging up cronin threw her ana the post down together and hd her down she had a revolver in her pocket but did not take it out until mr gronosky asked her for it when she gave it to him corroborative testimony was offered on motion ot of mr zane the ury aury was waa instructed to return a y verdict erdice of not guilty which was done mrs I 1 marks marched out of the courtroom as proud as a queen the next case on the docket was the people vs isaac jones an appeal cae froma from a spanish fork iusti cc s court jones jonesie im charged witti with stealing water from we toe big and lake sect i in a sp anish fork in may 9 1892 annes is a member of the spanish fork west field i tion co which has charge of the sect beet mentioned but it is alleged that he be took the water when it was not appo tinned to him the defensa defenda offered is that ner belu lations were made for the control of the water to ta tale take effect may mav SO 30 1892 the data it is alleged the water was in fd ly taken but that de no notice of this change and did not knew such change had bad baen bacri made after several witnesses had bad testified stifled te the court intruded the jury to return a verdict ol of not guilty the matter have been settled ly by civil suit and not by criminal prosecution the court was wroth over the bratter is alter and stated that atiat it if he had bad the aut authority bority he be would tax the costs of the case to the proe ecot ing bost wit witness nees A venire denire for the following juros jurors was issued alms alma hone benjamin james 11 clinger laire view james T gardner american fork thomas boardman provo ed mcbeth pay sn 3 D J B hoffman arrovo 1 roto the chargo charge of burglary against james tailor was dismissed by the district the Ean sentence tence of cf edwin jon jons jone e for race was set eat for march |