Show 10 IS uhl jury al V F f is I 1 I 1 0 thomas the mining suits suit TIMBER GUTTING CUTTING CASSE CASE A verdict for ahrea defendants tex borse steal ink ing oase again WEDNESDAY AFTERNOON the jury in the mining case of V L i thomas et al vs S K morria Nl orris trustee trost ce wai brought into court and asked it if they had agreed upon a verdict the report wits was made that they had rot but were about equally divided anes questions as a to points of law were asked and further farther instructions given were authorized to return a verdict after being out another three quarters of an hour a verdict for plaintiffs ntina was returned by the jurors john D dixon of this thi a city and william brown of alpine alpina weis the dissenters this gives plaintiffs plaintiff il possession of the A almo I 1 mo mining claim the attorneys attorn eya in the edwin jones rape case made their arguments before the jury but the court postponed the submitting of the case until thursday morning acile the attorneys attorney attorn eya ss were jones jonea sat eat within tle raising 1 with his wife beside him and his hia five months old babe on his knea while mrs anger the alleged victim of his lust eat vre weeping out outside side the railing her husband sitting by her side sympathizing with her in perhaps a rough but kind manner it was a pathetic acene FORENOON the jury in the edwin jones rape case casa were charged and retired they were instructed that a verdict of assault with intent to commit raps rape might be returned at 2 p in the jury in the ca case so of the people vs v edwin jones rape re turned returned a verdict of guilty as charged in tha indictment with a a recommendation of mercy an arrest of judgment for ten days was granted edward H redfern was arraigned on the charge of fornication alleged to hye have been committed with josephine sieg gell in grand county october 15 1892 he ha pleaded not guilty the cas case was set for hering hearing at the eirl earliest iest convenient day after tho the meeting of the supreme court redfern is a seedy unkempt tramp gh sort of individual ge gea rb sutherland is ia his attorn attorney ev TIMBER CASE in the case of tho the united states vs john foreman jaseph a 14 horrocks Hor rouLs aud and albert carlisle unlawfully crit cutting ting timber on the uintah mintah reservation it Is ia alleged that the offense Y was as coin august lat 1891 mr mi zane prosecuted and W H king dif defended ended mr king demurred to the indictment on the ground that a public offense was not stated indian reservations were nut mentioned in the statute it appealing pes flug that mr king had bad rot cot hold held of the wrong section tha demurrer was waa overruled ile he explained that he had been misinformed ai ad to the action by mr zane W L goodsell of salt lake testified to seeing the three defendants defend anta on uintah reservation two wagons were loaded with timber limber it was dry tira tim her ber witness had not seen defendants defend anta cutting the timber and did know whether the timber was standing or had fallen before it was cut I 1 note the statutes provides against tho the cutting of standing timber A flie fire had passed through he be timber and killed a great many trees the timber had not been hauled away witness and two other deputy marshals had arrested defend anty similar testimony was offered by mr Mo the tb indian farmer described tiie the reservation er boundaries mr king asked that the jury jary be in strutted ted to return a verdict for defends defend auto ante hs no testimony had bad been introduced to show that standing timber timbe r had been cut cat or that timber had been hauled from the reservation the court so BO instructed the jury anda verdict was accordi accordingly nelv returned A j jury ury was ampa em paneled meled in the charles durango tex grand larceny case it is alleged that defendant stole a gray gelding the property at ai james stewart 0 ot f emery county on cn the nigh of may three horses wera stolen on that night one of them by edwarc olds and louis louia van nata another ons on by liar ango the present trial is concerning the stealing of the third at the last term of court olds was convicted and sent to the reform school and subsequently ee ec ped van nata and barari duranso 3 we were te covic convicted ted and are berving in the penitentiary sir warner defended tex substantially ly the same ter testimony as was adduced at the former trial was giyen given |