Show I 1 DISTRICT COURT ANDREW OLSEN NOT GUITY or 01 ADULTERY A R strong has a rearing hearing he ha is I 1 af cusand of stealing a yearling other business FRIDAY rOBE KOOK the th case of hughes vs vi bachman Bach was war dismissed at plaintiffs cost the next case for trial was that of t r united states Ys va christian olsen ar an i amri aar i MP M P madsen madden wh wha are charge chang d with having committed tto crime of cf with one ne another the ariu i palee pale in the case live lire in San pio Llian tunney ty and both look like fair of low afe the woman in lie he ae bears the faint aart of indian blood bloomi ii i i ekr veins and would se scarcely arcely he be calad fascinating eten by the comm commonest unest twain swain the witnesses in the ease cast are re mrs hoops josephine Add adderson irson hoops ellen n MP Madsen and ilarie annerson Au nerson thi latter was at house last june and sawall saw all manner of familiarities absing carried on IDe between tween him and the woman madson they had bad walked together with their arma arms about one another se culled themselves in private rooms and on one occasion were discovered lying upon a bed together with their clothing 0 on ellen olsen mother of defendant stated that they chev were together in salt laie city and made it a p paint aint to be together at every possible opportunity and left for sanpete ban pete together the testimony of mr madain the husband of the woman before the bar jas as net admitted the tha 0 ther other witnesses gave testimony of defendants be being in z together on different occa occasions siona last august with t their h air arms around one another and huing hugging in a manner which gave ive the strongest sus dicion I 1 of their secial irregularities the prosecution rested expecting that a course of familiarities between these two would be sufficient to convict them ol 01 0 the crime charged the 1 fact act was brought out that olsen it at one time jumped out of a window while mrs madson camo came out of a door both to t escape detection tue defense had no n witnesses to ati put upil up n the stand bat claimed that there WA io m n 11 ti i u v toi brought e da mt ml na ats the tha case went to ta the jury alter I 1 tive min ites arg aru u indents on both sides after a short absence the jury in the andrew olson alaan et at al adultery case returned with a verdict of not the next case for trial was that of the leopla vs A R strong who is ia accused of the crime of having killed and a call anz near deep crook creek in uintah county Z zan tit prosecuted pro and and edwars defended the case cage J M allred tho tha compiling compi aing witness a cattle man who lives at vernal in ia uintah county testified to having been the owner of ef a lai laie ge brockel face calf which he missed last NO november and has a pretty good knowledge of who got get away with the calf the defendant strong streng was seen soon after with beet on his wagon which was secluded under some quilts which strong refused tl tc allow us to examine bat we found I 1 out before leaving leavine that there were four quarters quarter of cf beef they traced the wagon back to the herd berd from which they b had taken a ken the beef and found th entrails entrails and d place where the butchee butchering had been done dene and as an effort was shown to ha have veleen been made to secrete the evidences ot oi the tha dressing of the beef no hide was found and d it proved to be ba identical with that of MY calf 0 though the ears were cropped off close to the head bead and the brands had been disfigure dis disfigured figur ed to ta some extent strong claimed that he bought the beef aiom a mw dernis |