Show I 1 I 1 t 11 1 1 E EP C A N E I 1 tifft lip evidence eidew I 1 I 1 for tale del def I 1 J I 1 it SEELEY AND MOLAN I 1 testify in re el ard to the I 1 lannace Lan suase of 4 nephi allred allied M court resumed session sit at 2 the case of U 1 fitzpatric vs al r red fred J johnson was dismissed on se ac count stated to be due defendant to pay costs cost to the february term 1992 who had testified for plaintiff in the forenoon in the vs va L celesa sheep case cae was cross ex in regard to herding sheep for andrew olson and peter justeson ile he related how many sheep had been delivered out of the herd before the attachment tach ment were some soma of the sheep weak and scabby v when mr saeley au attached ached them ile ha did not re I 1 ember telli Lz mr that he nad had told ole that the sheep ought to be dipped when mr seeley attached the sheep if he be said anything it was that he had bad alced asked ole to help belp him dip dig them Au andreff drevy died him to take care of the sheep cheep sir alt brown D ri yoi live in spring city mr allred I 1 do ii 0 o when I 1 am there redirect re lie direct 1 I was in ferron after supplies when I 1 spoke to ole oie about dip pins ping the cheep I 1 had had no experience iu dipping sheep ho H nefer ne fer furnished in me e a any a i u p p i ic s w while h i 1 e I 1 herded the sheep h ae p A all 1 i t the h e ins instructions tr i i c t io I 1 received in regard to taking care of the tha sheep I 1 received from andrew olson when I 1 wa waa hired the sheep cheep taken by loveless were wera worth fr frota om ta 3 to 32 a a head ahead I 1 told seeley the tha sheep were ware andrew andraw olsons Ol I 1 told seeley whoa when he be first I 1 tame me up that I 1 had been looking for lim him thinking he was waft a sheep in specter and the tha sheep were scabby examined andrw andrew olsen had told me to turn out oat some sheep to mr lowry lowra 1 if lie ha came cama after thorn them he told me thib before I 1 went to work dar dan jeneen was war the next witness on the ibe second of march 1890 he be started to hoid heid for andrew oh oleen ohen en lao he herdel till the of augut august lie he and allred allied herded the sheep sheel together twelve or thirteen hundred head come into the hard about the last of july they were branded witti an 0 there wern were about weathers taken out of the 0 herd a after they were turned in to the general herd berd john lowry got head after that andrew olsen identified checks sent to ole oleson for fir wool 0 off ff oles olea sheep lit in 1690 the checks wore were adua admitted itte I 1 in in evidence he also allo testified that OWE olee family was sick and that was the reason he was not in court now BOW he was crosb cress exa examined minad in regard to oles olea absence and stated that he had bad sent a subpoena to his brother by mail he ha hild hid received a reply from ole and he ha was waa sant after the letter this closed the evi evidence evid denci enca for the plaintiff ff justice W seeley sceley was wag the first wit ness f for n r alio defence ile he testified to serving the phiners in the suit of mika alike molan malan TS ole olsen lsen in march 1891 1691 he was then a deputy sheriff obe riffin in er emery mery county he asked allred where ole oie olsons sheep wore were he told him and said 1 I I 1 am glad tu TOU tauaa tama I 1 ald ole oie list last all ti hiat the slifer 1 pe were rabb aud and thay tuh babl u tzg to b 8 dipp fed when mr air I 1 told air allred he hail bad not come to tee see about seab eab but to serve an execution on the sheep mr allred said eaid tb they av were andrews sheep be finally s said ric they wern sometimes known as OWE gobep and mr air set ley then hen d 1922 load boad of sheep and turned akem over to lo ole ola madson to tako care a at af thy were ware very 1 in ll lahl hl very scabby a fair macket value of sheep was VHS i 1 50 in the coDd condition iliou the were in lie ile i saw ole oie olson in ferron and served a sumi summons on him ahe defense endeavored to get eone teotimo ly fr from om mr seeley in regard to the minis by ole oleon to him on the ownership of the sheep I 1 lie he pla in tiffi objected and te lo 10 l o was sustained I 1 C court it rt adjourned till tuesday forenoon at 10 ocl ck FORENOON court opened at 10 mike mola rola the principal defendant in the olson et al vs loveless Loje leaa et al sheep case te to deliver delivering ing hi his herd stu to 2015 5 hrad to ole olson oison A number of conversa tiona with ole te vi tl show that he I 1 ola claimed to own t e after the time andrew andre c aenied they were him were asked to be introduced in evidence objected to 10 find and objection sustained mr bosan lan corroborated corr borAted the tha beati mony many of mr in regard to th the e conversation had with TN nephi hi allred at th tinaa the sheep were attached and aiso in regard gard to the iha condition if bf the sheep cheep A number of other witnesses testified fied to t lie condition of the sheep at the tibie of the attachment the poor condition of the wool taken from the sheep etc court till 2 |