Show 31 0 i 0 V A a my no asks star in the ascendant I 1 NOT A OLYE ESDALE the defenso defense in ill a suit on a Promis ory note other business transacted AFTERNOON the birdt district court resumed ses ees tion lion at 2 0 clock in the case caie of af anti city 4 savings bank vs stephenson et al order for decree of foreclosure counsel argued the case of starks marks vs va sullivan before the tha jury alter after jud judge jude e blackborn Black Blaek barn burn had bad delivered his instruct lons U lo 10 the jury court adjourned till friday morning at 10 TOREN rO BENOON OOlf court opened at 10 the jury in the damage suit of anna marks vs J T sullivan et al came in with a sealed verdict in favor of mrs marks for against J T salli sullivan ivan D B S dna dana and d delle belie tompkins 11 9 thirty days dats stay of execution was granted thirty days stay of execution was granted in the case of anna marks vs W fl calmer et rl nl when mrs marks was awarded damages in the sum of for the loss losa of her house and goods which was rein relayed ved from her house which was waa torn down by the defendants fend ants on the ol of december issa in tho case of wm P ala merril ril vs wro wm Hod guison appeal dismissed and remanded to the lower court la in the tha case of ellaba Iisha stevens vs thos misley et al judgment fr fr plaintiff upon an agreed statement ement ot of facts exception in the case of jens 0 jen jensen on vs ta jas jaa B et al demurer demerer to complaint subba sustained ined 20 days given to amend abary was paneled em in the case of j john 0 h brinn ei on vs norman halliday et al this is a suit brought on en a p promis romi ory sory note of given for a clydesdale 1 horse the defendants objected to pan paving the note noia on the ground th that a t th e horse was not a purebred pure bred horse horsa as be was warranted to be by the plaintiff the they v have paid on en the hoise boise and object to paying rig the remaining S SOO king houtz are counsel for the defendants fend ants and gash gaab for the N WN one of the defendants testified to buying the tha horse upon mr rinna waran war antea iee of f the horse being a purebred pure bred clydesdale registered by the american studbook of the clydesdale association they had given two notes one of 1300 and one of SOO in payment for the th horse the horse had bad been bought for breeding purposes and when it was discovered C that the horse was not a pure pnra br bra clydesdale lydesdale lyd esdale and not registered in african stud book they were r tu abrain any custoda for the he be c u he was worth about JOO the image they had sustained amounted t ti the horse was registered in an association ion in canada which registered horses borses that were not pure bred Glydes dalea mr nielson was cross examined bv mr air While cotton in regard to his knowledge of clydesdales Clydes dales norman neman S halliday another defendant corroborated the testimony of me hie defendant codefendant co upon cross examination mr okite cotton raked him if he had seen any clydesdale Clyde eddle horses he ha replied that he had bad seen one in ia spanish fork mr does your horse look like him mr halliday Hal Halli lidny dRy no sir not any more than I 1 look like y you on elmer taylor taylar gave expert test testimony mona on the characteristics of the clydes ile he had seen the horse in question he be took look h ajai i ra to be across with a shire and some other stock hp hf was worth from V to 30 lie he ll 11 khaw ew of the dominion draft boree breeders bleeders Bre eders society of Cana canada that society registered res entered grades and not purebred canles mr of San santaquin Sante quin also zae wo za e expert testimony he had an ex tan civo experience v ath horses and th the e horse in q question u estion i ig not a clyde according to hi ju judgment dment tl ala d pe of the horse from the dominion society waa admitted in evidence after a short argument by counsel co and instruction of the court tha case was given to the jury court adjourned till 2 |