Show 1 I I 1 0 the is minued Co t a RIGHT HIG alt TO CROSS TRACK TRACE I 1 of the union pacific not granted arguments of the counsel af W B preston followed i ilar backlin testifying in m the c ise of eatho the union pacific railroad company vs the tb tintic gintic matito itana ile he corob rated orated mr becks testimony hr yard a civil eng izear in ia the tha employ of the tintic gintic range rane cora com pany testified that the union pacific railway company had not attempted to build any tract ou oa the ali ground where the tintic gintic rings eange railway company had commenced ito te build their track until after aay had commenced T was gevea chewing the tha ailes of building the track on line that is ia 0 1 ejected to by the ducioa pacific railroad company other testimony was taken the i case argued by counsel cou uel court adjourned till wednesday morning mornine WEDNA IDly FORENOON in the first Dis district Bi trist court the arga argument in tin union pacific YE ve the tim tic raw railway company of way suit i i ia a eureka was wa continued this mor dorming ming mr V van an cott catt argued against the right of the tintic range ry kr co to con condoling condan doming nag property for a right of way over the th track of tie th union pacific for far the purpose of ef laying a side bide track to the or ore house bouse of the bullion beck and i Cj chapo champion aPo raining som ompa By for the reab that the right of way was wa not wanted for public use lat at only to reach the bullion bock back and champions champion ore house bouse authorities were cited the evidence wits wax reviewed showing v that no danger would result to the bullion ballien beck lud aud champion hoisting works by the tintic gintic railway co building their track on the south 8 side of the plaintiffs ntina track and that it was a practicable routs mr Whitt Whit cotton scotton angud in favor of ef the tintie range ranga railway company be ing left in the came me pos position as before atle injunction was waa served by bv the union railway until the th question of the right of cf con dem nation should be decided he claimed the gintic tintic eange hailway co had bad commenced work on the disputed ground before the union pacific co he took the granad that the of f way was wanted for public usa ugo and not exclusively clu for individual use uce SM as had h ad been ca claimed aimed by mr vau van cott judge bennett and geo sutherland followed foll ewed presenting presetting pre setting points in ia favor fator oi 01 the companies budza jud so blackburn denied the tion of tho temporary injunction served upon tho the tintic gintic rabea railway com cam patty paar and refused granting request of the rio kio orande grande Wa for con damnation demnati of right of cf way iter ver the track of the union pacific court till Thur thursday day morning at 10 ocl oak |