Show r of prove democratic receive a stinging rebuke because of an professional profess lonal brief the supreme court held an ad journe session yesterday chief justice zane and judge and miner were present clerk bache is abrant from the city and assistant clerk john 0 filled fill edthe position six opinions wefa banded down in the case of anna knudson vs julius haarberg et al which was tried before blackburn an appeal waa taken from an arder beus ins to set asiala to alie widow of knud aeu a homestead and personal the property was valued at and tho personal property at lower court getil that the widow was not entitled to a third interest as provided by the statutes unless the estate was insolvent and ordered a distribution of the property among the heirs the supreme court holds be widow should have a dower right in the pra perty or a life estate and the case is sent back to the lower court to baye the order of division modified judge miner delivered the opinion M J weak appellant va W J child et al ass the next case this is an appeal from the judgment of the court of the first district while miner was bit bics tics the appellant entered sui against the respondents and they filed a demurrer which was sustained and the action wib thrown out of court this decision ia affirmed tho original suit was regarding a land claim at oden anderson delivered the opinion zane and blackburn concurring the case of W D I 1 smith efa al ap belant asi martin williamson involves only about the case waa tried bs fore judge the defendant admitted the promissory note but held he was drunk at the time the lower court endorsed abia view of tha matter the supreme court however holds that the note was not void bat and subsequent transactions mide it binding tho casa was therefore rs versed chief justice zane delivered the opinion anderson and miner concur ius in the case of valentine thomas and S W kalliam Pa lliam appellants appe lants vs S K morris trustee of the gladstone mining company the decision was hadded down by judge aanderson and judges zine and miner concurred involving the claim to certain the suit was begun m and laet december a judgment vas rendered in favor ol 01 ane plaintiff by default A stay was obtained and later motion to vacate the judgment was made anc sustained but tho defendants werd ordered te pay the costs the judgment of lower court ia affirmed in closing the opinion says in the printed brief of appellants counsil they several times refer to the plaintiffs as miners and poor men with poverty and sickness in the house etc while the defendant in interest the bullion beck and cham company was referred to as a rich corporation whether the plaintiffs are actual miners or are mere speculators and whether they have poverty and B lck ness of health and luxury in their homes and whether the defendant ia 7 or an insolvent corporation and whether the laboring masses will be alarmed at the conclusion reached by us are questions wholly immaterial in the case are not proper subjects of comment by counsel in this court and concerning which not a word can be found in the record the brici of ap pel lents counsel is a flagrant violation of the rules which prevail in all courts and it is ordered stricken from the first of this court and counsel for appellant are admonished that a repetition of the will be attended attend rd with consequences other that a mere rebuke M M bellona and E E cortman the attorneys at orneys referred to tre case of james wilson vs jossph appellant was an action on a mining claim purchased the plaintiff obtained judgement jud gement and the dici siou 0 the lower court was sustain ed the ceif justice baye the opinion anica was in by judge anderson ani minei the judgment ot the lower court wag affirmed in the case of cynthia ejones jane the euit was ia regard to the possession of certain properly at payson and the court held the plaintiff to be the rightful owner U fi wamer vs G A barry et al dismissed under rulea 3 and 4 john link appellant vs salt blahe city taken to states su drescoe court this action involves the title to plat J bond was made W 0 annett et al va william garland appeal in two cases prayed to the united states supreme court nephi irrigation company vs aich ard jenkins submitted en briefs lewis A scott vs george 0 whit niora argued by 0 ti for appellant and W H dickason for respondents and submitted the casa of william H wood vs moylan forjet aland john F writney Wb itney va hovlan pos were being argued when court adjourned for the day the court will leei rt Q 30 this morn inc the case of the college appropriation wilF probably be argued today winiard D thompson of michigan II 11 of california admitted to the bar herald |