Show IN VS TILDEN the jury finds for plaintiff bowe tafts electric light suit MONDAY AyTEn NOON court resumed cession at 2 after the attorn oya in the grange vs houtz euit had tho case before the jury judge blackburn delivered his instructions and tho enry A jury was em paneled in the case of W L dark vs marshall tilden this ia a suit brough to recover the price 0 a span of horses sold to mn tildan the defense ia that the horses wera bold to the payson cannine creamery and dirr co of which mr ca ia manager and not to mr tilden sutherland is coun ael for mr dark and samuel L page for mr W L dark testified to bellins the horses to mr tilden far on 30 days tima mr tilden was to havo givan him a note with bood security but ia a hurry ahsu ho the horses anil did not give a note marahall tilden testified that he bought the horses for the company he had never told mr dark that ha would alvs his personal note for the team air dark agreed to let 25 go on the subscription ol 01 stock in the creamery and dairy boand the balance to ha paid in thirty days ho had afterwards suit magninat mr tilden for the amount the jury in tho grange va buntz aasi cimo n sni a stid cl ici ane defendant archbo bingham hingham of canning and dairy co testified tn havins receive from mr dan to pay mr dark mr dark had refused to receipt the order mr hancock testified that mr dark hid told him that ho would turu 25 on his subscribed stock to the com piny this closed the evidence the mony oi II ingham and way tt ricken out after attorneys had addressed the jury judda blackburn abo jury thal if they believed beli aved mr dark know at tho timo he bold the horses that ho was selling them to mr gildea as an agent they should find lor the defendant but it thay believed he bold them to mr tilden per sonly they should find for the plaintiff the jury was out about ten minutes and rot arned a verdict for thu tiu for and interest court adjourned session till tuesday morning at IU TUESDAY FORESi jOS court met at 10 ano case of geo stags vs A 0 etal was at plain tiu e coat A jury waa empanelled empanel led iu tho case of provo milla co vs boive fe laft this is a case where the prove woolen mills co sue for the right of possession of electric licht fixtures iu the store of dovye the woolen mills go alie cusa is appealed from court the plaintiffs claim that the fixtures were placed there as their property subject to he taken away the woolen mills co ceased to supply electric licht the defendants claim the fixtures frere bought keiu amot superintendent cf provo 1 ooley mills co at the the lime tho was put in was called by the ph guluf he testified to provo woolen mills co buying the electric fixtures and placing them in howe gioie the wiring was done by T E daniels on his own account abo electric liht fixtures from tho rosetter rosett fr down te longed to the woolen 0 ia tats burldine buil dine lor supplying eup plying botre taft electric light the ie worth about joiseph W secretary and treasury of the provy milla ov teh liged to howe tabb tho fix from the provo mills co to ba belt in the stora while they were using the electric la Oct olier last year of the de asked witness who dixs tures belonged belon aed to and witness had explained that the fixtures from the rosette down belonged to the provo woolen mills co A T E daniela had no authority to seel the fixtures T EDs nicla testified that tha fixture the down belonged to ilia arrivo woolen mills co air hamilton a man employed by mr danieli had the put fixtures ui in store ne illier witness nor camilio Ha milio had any authority to sell tiia fi and did not bell thein cross examined I 1 told t lie wiring should belong to bui iba drob the fixtures from the ro down to the company air tatt of howe testified tied that mr daniela and hamilton had to take the lights told them fc boy would own all the fixtures in the acore by paying for each light D inels did not say any thin iu canara of and IIi milton said they alo fend antii coald at auy time connect frith another comply crosbi examined daniels and hanilton did say in sd many words that the and fixtures irsai alia ceiling should belong tu us but I 1 had billit idea redirect never asked ir duna rt hosn ano property belonged to I 1 a airty they belonged tu na was called never had aay with daniel in regard to ibo the v to john H mcewan was aal it air daniels had told liua haa he pat the light in his lacs of business that the fixtures fix turea would belons to him to atil court adjourned till 2 |