Show I 1 02 there Is 1 lawa lawyer er in the who will fr to ion tho the and lot allty ii 1 ho compiled in it liu ok folin unior uro der the title or tho the r elect corob by judge ovo oto W me crary tit t present one of tile the united judges and himself on an acknowledged able ex x pon cider or law that ho sui tuta taini iiii HIP flip doctrine that hut iha duties of officers cerl or of election at are and not judicial cliff can be 10 welly sven cn hy by men inen of ev evri ri limited than dun L ell if 11 murray on oil pace gi cl arhia diw Elect lonn long ulie reli t lie ha ahne olneq flip powers find duties oni cert it ilia Is avell ind that lite doden of can vain are purely and X t en nl IV V to the up of tha votes vole and awarding the to lo the th person baa the loi ghent they have no j I 1 po potter er in iii state vs bleers 44 ma TI 1 15 ov blob va van it a ope caia in which the hie a tl rl had bad to th throw roio out tile the returns return horon one ori voting porcio iri net lor for in an alleged the lie court sald when a ministerial guiv v ilia hla proper ap phie hotle aBt not to in ludle lud loHl al function si he ha la Is exceeding t alio to limit odthe law and gouty or t lion I 1 and again I 1 io ill a mere lite re ln ly to reject rn re I 1 tyrnn turns tit at his hl more caprice en price rod and plo analco lot in to tn into inge or destroy the rights or orp parties arlle it hout notion nomie or nr ty to bu be fo lard 1 n the be bopf lw abhors arid and r l I 1 ill to 1 it enn file h clearly sern that ili 11 II I 1 or of mr murray jn in giving CArn the of elea elevation cle cllon tion I 1 lint legally IcEr belonged belo oceil to mr cannon ir fr we tire ft to accept judge judda mccrary McCrar yi uth urill ni of any vitrue I 1 ot of judicial functions and art an of power 1 1 mccrary further byg the true rule li Is this ibis they mint receive a aud count iho hy by the llin ro t lurn urns und and they cannot yi behind the me re ans ir r kiy nn purpose ato and na this if lly y I 1 it it paper is in prunell pru neil ted M a fell tn and thors thore Is a quest question lon all n to heth er it in att a or not they irnine decide that fron froles abst appears li donihe the face of the lh piper paper thus I 1 in new york it hall bf ild hald bat lio ilia little ortha nore to 10 roland nt at itle ilia r u p or tollice anti calculate and nd nicor t ain pl I 1 clr e whole of votes given at liny any and artir y ilia ama to boa baa truo true canvass I 1 this is not mot a judicial act but Into rosly minie riall they have no power lo 10 a conti olve it tho ol of vs rait vari 4 coun conn to I 1 the lid nana m effert ia tile ruling li fit ex part sleuth health 3 17 47 mccrary contin noa noss on pago 0 of hla his hook book and in morgan vs 22 sai na b 77 w had find this mi llroy they ilia canvassers can vir rare ma M a not at to r evidence of anything outside or of tho fit returns it their claty lili in ft simple orri sater of amalia 1 has also thompson Vs vi sunny elvir 1 I 1 Arn arnhoff 77 skeie it 1 in I 1 lam annn that but the ike murn judges cannot not enquire into a of fraud jn ili tho 6 fit vf va fiend 25 23 III the court talu said illey r taj n my probably 0 bly judas bather the returns ar re 1 in d duo a arm but t after that the y c CUB 1 only corn com puts chii cast firth forthe baval candi ivilyn and nl coelo Is clira iha dea result rut bid in do to tile ali foun of tuo the returns tabt illy n ninnor no I 1 the autin tance slid not 1 LB I 1 leelin ical if there ill a at torn avi t ll 11 i law i W i it L I 1 t norih n nou c ugh ih the th dl allt that lt c i a etl F bo bogli a rt 1 i anti and re judgen are pull pu n g tin or judicial planer settled la is IR ill nearly or quite alt all the ib katoa I 1 mers ber follow thirteen authorities hy by ds 1 a hil 0 in baiel ou cue authorities 1 ali I Q supreme court of nyi scon sin says ill alii I 1 alio I 1 to 10 cars are to add up and c artil y by melilla cAlo iila onto ion thulium I 1 be number bar 0 of votes for any amog bihy ihy have no da mastodon to hear or take proof fari a to franda el yn elen en it if morally orlly lii certain that monstrous frands havi have kil been ai ai apy morgan vs 23 22 barb y X Y 72 it to la bet halil to lo bo be ill alin duty duly of the lb lioard board ati 0 canvass the ali muffin and n d declare the lh result and IH that ilas 14 A unla U ministerial suit aut they are ir ja of af ant not not A t allo allow rrt to lo receive evide tice af out fill ofilio re hirut hone edliler they aceil IN 1 fea elving am diorite eilent at the P poll 0 and I 1 A idt i ing it g it upon pa rot a burli u oi a 0 th 1 I 1 lar M 1 A I 1 lion ion although bod based upon illegal must be rec dpn ana acci do evid eviden enve that oil alir inn deol arod a aclei WAs w on n titled to aboa and 1 hat in attempting tn the tha ola lots not nd net del abide their first they transcend d th their air authority and twined ow ined a leover 1 V er be 10 zing only to ft a tribunal nil 09 t V 11 ad to I 1 try ry cases of contested lct loni under the he taw law on oil page of anderl canlow can brew or of elections will also alo be found tile the follow rollow lic tog tile the eligibility and of inith datter late Ws f come now to a qi ailion lion which hm hall an cmach discussed mid aud upon th ahi coi bo rilles are it it ahll iha who hus has to re ore folva I 1 V id the tu highest number of ole for it an n cinca lies to li ineligible and ud hat his nu a ita kno know ill to ibosh who bo 0 for chy cant their vota are ar tile th vot thus cost cast for win blui to boa b thrown out of the count and treated as never ca casi stand ind abowd ahoi id the adidge tie be do d elated elected in such M van 07 no na doubt leha english rill rals Is ii that bero the nis jorl ty 14 1 ineligible ind find lout beletA notice of his ineligibility ha bas ben bean the person tanil highest numo atlas vil gible me maist bill b deolar eit ed elipa elcid tild an esain nation of tbt lb ebig lih 1 Is h cue buei mil lilt shaw that aliat la ia some orne of tholia 1 tho lie election tle cllon WIK auld mil and sent nt lk back to llis llin poo anle ou on tho gro roii ti lad Bil t h at there wa a a ot in lun dent lelent ci otlee aft the h a I 1 loni 0 m acety OL el the alrod kiwo tn others I 1 le minority candidate war do of alired ared elected nu tho the ground that dult du tta 04 I 1 cc of lite of the person r ra tr elving eitan eiT ln the majority WM wal given albough the th hi law of the lb perils mul mint BI as wll wait its aliat la in the ot of that country reco ionizes ebe rule as laid do down dora ra in ia the cases lust ut cited the house or of tho the united artates itei has refused to adopt it mae I 1 lh he two easo of vs drown crown 2 bartlett fart lett in ia which in au ma report submitted by art air battee cb of the iho commilles Com millee of election r the ibe author itle arel are reviewed and nd I 1 tha he cour funion is i resulted that thai this lb law or of tile british parliament in 10 till has never bin in ifal this country and la Is wholly inapplicable to tho the foider we WB ilya aud generally take ark 2 view abua iii n Clu curl 60 ZU st at it J 20 the tha supreme court 0 of liell lint where at i an election for ithaniel at majority of 0 the th oer otes are et cast for a mono I 1 abe he next in vote tote is t not to ile returned retura od tv elected W 1 here inada to A dumber of this v law ilni ll ni it will ha be gea fea that th the tha weight ul of authority orlly in this thin country Is in decidedly inre here or ali the doctrine locci inc anil and we f bilz lag ii st abat bound poll policy y as i well its reason arid forbids the adoption ot of wet doctrine I 1 t this counts countey y it Is a fundamental idea wida lt not n taftt ibm the rule cord tid that thal is majority or WP wo a t 1 e plurality too lie ired to ait 0 elect e P pernon cin p ID 1 0 doug by 1 Y vote voir an all election with us incited Iop of a or or of the eleo tor any doctrine aich opens ipe iiii the alio wy for in ili h anti anil republican antl anil anti anil A marleo tho rho anglish rule nile it if cheril adhered lh eril to would woud in abany cases ja in 0 large MK to very ery niall nn nit an ineligible n may receive re celie and in many WMS erfle am a cel ay ed a great tile lie vote judge mccrary ilion frers to ill t hio c no wee case of f jul jaseph aph abbott abbot I 1 of north carolina the decision in I 1 that ease against tho adoption of aliu ill english in till albott b who abo he ha rt calved illy it ty of tam ahm votes caba cla lined n R split in the lie St sanate nate nil ilia groaned riia nl that lie we wat tile only fl iHla person voled for waa pit pil not but elected and it b wn i distinctly in ili tile repart or me corn COID unit tre that the th fact th alint at the voters have notice or of the ty of file HI at the if llinus ino they east their votes for him hau inake i no nn 11 the ark of julge jug 0 Sr in vs clidell klinl abal the II 11 irnen ir nun is it person still and every voto thrown fur for ii formal forin nl H quota 4 lilt the tha brawl inn ell that in 1114 country no nil ly by it of hie file germini ler mini volltin if 14 not to tit hn bo tolerated under miller any cl aco in to the f glendi of ell EH 11 II murray and tire elom fow awit atut at present and alic or of the anti IOL to to elections in fit ulah publiA pulli ilic ed in ili aalt liki under tinder thoo the nome if the tribune urn are living in fit HIP flip that lite ono or tile the tile lie country in ili relation to ti the murray outrage will undergo it 11 chan go a till flint itie opinion of if the Arne rican will alan he be reversed now we have quoted tile ablove aul aulbort borl I 1 alin le not if ai the opinions of lilt great ivl ivi if nl I 1 mandi or the iho age lint but its ii choit upon which the right of But fruge in ahli country IS founded |