OCR Text |
Show v i MARITAL WOES ' OF ECCLES FAMILY i-airt Divorced Wife's- Complaint am is 1 1 I Against Husband Alleges Failure to Pay Alimony. nothn ream frw- otfei sp" -iai !' Tiif Tribune, lb an O'U'L'.V. J.n.. IP - Afu-i : i?;n!ns rBll yllf'-l' OC'MjplO' ilio Httcntioii of .ImJs--' N n-"rw.'- L''1,r'? T I ' : 1 1 ' 1 T i'- 1 part of ,-,nJM Uif -.-)r .r M.iini l'. iv irs :is.)iii.t her KoSgf ll'v"r' '"'l Ivisluiinl. V illi.-im !' !.-. for the I Or-I ,ai''irp t'-i p:iy alimony which was -)?- n ifff rv tin- f'uurl in ;i 1 -- i 1 n n-turnol l'-dW 'n P"1- 1'"'v Mrs. Eccles alleca Hint , ycB Mv. I".,(1f9 inllod pay the sum jf "".Ti Tvliicli va sr.mted lo her fur the I support of a minor fluid. B In axiewer to the affidavit upon whi'-h Mi'. 1 was cited fi Bhow cause why mH Ik- h:u) ri"i p:iiJ ilio n linnnv his iitlnv- 9 ney Btalod thai the courl had u Jurls- diction and thai ;in imposition had been I committed bj ti.- plaintiff and her attor mivW ii'"' Tlx- ilf. ori o n' . : Hues, he al l.-8lw leff'd, 1ihi been st.-.it-, hi tlx courl ;ii rn A Tirff, Or , in December, Ifl c:xj a le- malH ' of divorce w;i. suhseuntly granted nsti Mrs. Eccle.' thpn InstltutcH divorce pro- f lK cocdings m the Second district courl iiere lio i-i 1 "n or . i;i 1 . i'"'- This courl also srent-.2 srent-.2 fi 1 deer"-. .Mr. L' no( appearing to oppose lifr rfffir; m thi latter case in ouql this connection the attorne for the de-arv de-arv 1 ' Fendant lif'd that hi client holds lihn-Amt lihn-Amt self H-nrmable to 1 1 couti 'f proper Jurisdiction, namely, the Oregon court, "niv -, 1 i-,i " :i - . i- . ' - -1 i-i .1 1 Tow tlx- r ' ' i'-ri !' !' " :"i' I" -' 1 1 1 ' ' ' l.i.-I'n l.i.-I'n .lii ic . jnlyl In ,msur the charge of non-jurls-allflj i difi'un Attorne.v John C Davis, repre- i!te Mtittng Mrs. IScclea resented tlie Inslnua-s Inslnua-s Ufl ' lion thai '.i'- :j n . 1 iii, , 1 1 1 1 1 .-. iuix --i:ic , on 'Ik ' -J court Hmi raid he would ri.cn iji'i'-x-v on t.ii.- i"iint even to ' tlx- et'nt of disliannonl proceedings, if .- -,-. in drf. m ii Malm ha 1 t'i' 'ill 'nf jurisOh-i ion in tho matter, A 1 1 Pavls stated thai even though Js divorce proc-eedlngs had bren siartc-d In n,'c- "tlx-i . - 1 . i,h. r-lsln to abai don ua i thf-ix ;i-.;, suil in another court. I Th- drtrn(i;int was the flrsl witness on the stand, but before hr liod I an.Hro.i nioro than n dozen questions cGW aliorny t,,; iJp rl( jiii s.li-ti.m iiicaii rf!nmfii a.Kaln. and al ,11 tlx ,,url rislB deferred the matter to some time next -quetf i-. u. it i.r-ins tgsary to take up other I -.asfu In the meantime sssS in bis f-stlmony Mr. Eccles represent-I represent-I d that he is a i-f-sidciit of l" Or., and I Iih'1 npnt the Rieater part of his life "'x ' i-- -11, 1 t:,ai h- willing Mrs, i; Eflcs fhould have her ih ercf if divorce :ii" 1 i reedy to providi I f?r vl,e and l'nlid. inn did not want B Ihe ailmony proxision 111 the uerc This I I he explained to Davis, but said that th" I attorney did not do aS hi was fold n-m.. n-m.. p nJinj; the disposition of the |