Show till sl US the majority of the Judges a kercher or appointed the Sa supreme prenie court met at 11 0 tuesday morning w with ith all of the judges present the court room was waa crowded with spectators spec most of whom came iu in expectation of bear ing the arguments of the eminent gentlemen who are engaged as aa coun del of in the church suits the cameto caseto ut of tho the united stat staten 0 va the church of josua christ of latter liny day saints sainte fn an and 1 the perpetual emi grat iLig fund company wore were sailed balled and the mott motion 1 oa to appoint it a receiver receiver briefly argued uru eil colonel bro it ahead for or the defense stated as the demur filed by the defendant raised the question of the tha constitutionality of tile ina law under which the suits were brought I 1 and odthe of the jaried jurisdiction action of the court it should ho be of first ile he therefore asked k ed that the demurrer bt be set a ot for argument in its order senator mcdonald then spoke briefly upon this point mr hobson ll for the plain plaintiff till stated that be thought 1113 question of it a receiver should come up first and the demurrer afterwards the issues presented in tho the demurrer would probably be taken before the supreme court of tile the united states a and ot the delay would prevent tho the appointment of 0 a receiver which would work injury to the plaintiff pending the settlement battlement of the litigation a receiver should be appointed tor for tho the pro protection lection of the property and in order that their should be im pair paired L d mr mcdoanld Donnld Mc replied that it was the ho legill legal right of the defendant to 1111 a 11 demurrer and to be Tole beard bear u upon it it in in order to learn whether w bethe r to he should bo be required to make further answer the d defend an t I 1 0 rights would ia not ot be impaired ino nor would the lue government be ba I 1 injured a red by defendant having bovine possession posse ision oj ox th tho property pending the liti litigation gatio ID it was as set forth in in the demurrer that tha abo law under which these suits were brought was invalid and the legality aliby of appointing a receiver should be ba determined b before the appointment was made and the constitutionality of tho the law under which the actions were brought should be decided before the details of the case casa were entered into mr hobson and colonel broad bead both spoke briefly and the rno ano kioa after some consultation between the judges judge zane announced that it was the opinion of a majority of the court that a motion to a appoint a receiver receiver isho should aid be brought up first mr asked for a postpone me ment n t of the be hearing aring for some the solicitor general of the united states state was e expected to attend to the case person Y mr peters stated staled that the solicitor general was leading counsel in the case care nod and the date set for the bearing wool would not allow the time necessary tor for him to conae come here P F B S richards here that at af ter consultation between counsel on oa both sides bides it was thought that BO an a agreement gre ement upon a statement of facts could be reached judge doreman boreman inquired it if this would shorten the proceedings and mr air Richar lifs replied that if an agree merit ment were reached it would obviate the taking of testimony which might otherwise occupy weeks mr dark clark thought though tan an aarre agreement emen t could be reached by 2 it it t could be reached atall at all but bat Mr M richards asked for a posta postponement bement until 10 0 clock this morning g which was waa grant 0 ed d court then adjourned till fill wednes day |